News: Jan 07, 2025 Show

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

Dec 1st: If your account has been hit in the most recent ban wave of compromised accounts please reach out to us at management[at]e621.net and we'll help you get your account back.
If you've already contacted us give us a moment to get to you, though if it takes longer than a day for us to get back to you do feel free to reach out again!
Dec 2nd: If you got got and suddenly aren't able to see any of our exquisite selection of sausage and taco posts double check that Safe Mode is disabled in your account settings (Account -> Settings -> Safe mode [right above the blacklist text box]).

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

Topic: Tag Implication: falala -> lalala

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The Kirby character Lalala and the Adventures of Lolo character Lala are technically the same character, but we don't seem to have any Adventures of Lolo images yet... -1 for me because:

1. This should've been an alias.
2. All versions of this character collectively have only 1 image to their name. 0 Falala, 1 Lalala and 0 Lala (well, actually 18 but none are of this character).

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
The Kirby character Lalala and the Adventures of Lolo character Lala are technically the same character, but we don't seem to have any Adventures of Lolo images yet... -1 for me because:

1. This should've been an alias.
2. All versions of this character collectively have only 1 image to their name. 0 Falala, 1 Lalala and 0 Lala (well, actually 18 but none are of this character).

I don't understand as there is an implication of "fololo -> lololo" in place.

Updated by anonymous

xchellx said:
I don't understand as there is an implication of "fololo -> lololo" in place.

I did a search, and I don't see the tag at all.

Updated by anonymous

xchellx said:
I don't understand as there is an implication of "fololo -> lololo" in place.

Neither tag has implications/aliases, I edited in your text to include the wikis fololo & lololo; and BlueDingo's second reason is correct. Furthermore, if an alias/implication existed for both, you would not have been able to make this thread as it would have shown an error message.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
Neither tag has implications/aliases, I edited in your text to include the wikis fololo & lololo, and BlueDingo's second reason is correct. Furthermore, if an alias/implication existed for both, you would not have been able to make this thread as it would have shown an error message.

It did show a error message for lololo

Updated by anonymous

xchellx said:
It did show a error message for lololo

So you are bringing a tangentially related point... because? There is no alias or implication, there is a pending one that's off topic.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1
  • Over 18?

    You must be over the age of 18 and agree to the terms of service to access this page.

    By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.