Implicating pepper_the_poochyena_(character) → fan_character
Link to implication

Reason:

It's a fan character.

...Why does it have _(character) at the end? _the_poochyena already makes it unique.

¯\(°_o)/¯

there's probably a reason for that

titanmelon said:
¯\(°_o)/¯

there's probably a reason for that

There shouldn't, if it's categorized properly.

Suggesting pepper_the_poochyena_(character) -a-> character:pepper_the_poochyena

Furrin_Gok said:
...Why does it have _(character) at the end? _the_poochyena already makes it unique.

Lots of less experienced users seem to think adding (character) or (artist) is the way of setting the tag type, even if the tag doesn't require being disambiguated.

Tuvalu said:
Lots of less experienced users seem to think adding (character) or (artist) is the way of setting the tag type, even if the tag doesn't require being disambiguated.

I guess it's better safe than sorry, but it should be aliased to remove the suffix before it's implicated.

Moved manually and approved the tag without the _(character) suffix. There's only 4 posts so I doubt it will be a huge issue.