invalid_tag shouldn't imply anything at all.
Updated by ippiki ookami
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
invalid_tag shouldn't imply anything at all.
Updated by ippiki ookami
Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
invalid_tag shouldn't imply anything at all.
Now there is a whole lot of images tagged "ranged_weapon" and subsequently "weapon".
Updated by anonymous
Akkira said:
Now there is a whole lot of images tagged "ranged_weapon" and subsequently "weapon".
Looks like somebody fucked up badly here, this should be unimplicated before it can cause any more tagging errors.
Updated by anonymous
720p said:
Looks like somebody fucked up badly here, this should be unimplicated before it can cause any more tagging errors.
Err... now that I think about it I've recently suggested aliasing bow_and_arrow to invalid_tag, and bow_and_arrow was AFAIR implied to ranged_weapon. But I've only made just a suggestion, right? Only admins can approve it?
Updated by anonymous
From what I can tell, the suggestion made the system (on the implications side) think that it was approved, so all implications tied to it were put into effect, causing ranged_weapon to get implied to invalid_tag.
Updated by anonymous