Implicating crotch_rope → rope_bondage
Link to implication]I want to implicate crotch_rope → bondage instead and I've changed the wiki so the tag applies not only to ropes, but straps and ribbons as well.

Reason:

crotch_rope is a bondage-related version of pussy_floss.

post #458181 doesn't feature bondage, just a rope sliding over the crotch. (In this case, the tag might not belong, though, according to the wiki article)

Furrin_Gok said:
post #458181 doesn't feature bondage, just a rope sliding over the crotch. (In this case, the tag might not belong, though, according to the wiki article)

Okay, better example: post #92087 post #316387 ribbons over the crotch instead of ropes.

Also, I wonder if we should change the wiki for Crotch Rope, baed on images like post #791139. The rope ties around the penis here, which is about the same as the female's equivelant of sliding across/into the labia.

Furrin_Gok said:
Okay, better example: post #92087 post #316387 ribbons over the crotch instead of ropes.

We can always use the pussy_floss tag for non-rope related posts.

Furrin_Gok said:
Also, I wonder if we should change the wiki for Crotch Rope, baed on images like post #791139. The rope ties around the penis here, which is about the same as the female's equivelant of sliding across/into the labia.

Sure, that sounds good to me.

sdrawkcaB said:
We can always use the pussy_floss tag for non-rope related posts.

Didn't know about that tag, gets a +1 here.

I'm unsure of where we should go with this, but I've at least implied this one to rope for the meantime.

Denied because it's not always related to bondage