Implicating breast_suck → suckling
Link to implication
Implicating breastfeeding → suckling
Link to implication
Implicating nipple_suck → suckling
Link to implication

Reason: current description of "suckling" indicates sucking of breasts (breast_suck) and/or nipples (nipple_suck) w/ or w/o lactation (breastfeeding)

EDIT: The tag implication breast_suck -> suckling (forum #188549) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

I'm not sure about an implication, but I'm starting to think an alias would be more appropriate for breast_suck/nipple_suck.

parasprite said:
I'm not sure about an implication, but I'm starting to think an alias would be more appropriate for breast_suck/nipple_suck.

There's no distinction made for nipples w/o breasts vs nipples w/ breasts. The tags are used indiscriminately as is. How to fix it, though?

+1 for all implications.

socklover5 said:
+1 for all implications.

No.
I'm guessing that you do literally 0 research before providing your opinion.

It's a more complicated topic than just "yeah, sure, why not".
Breast suck and nipple suck imply sucking.
I don't know if suckling is a necessary tag at all, and it can be confused with sucking.

Breastfeeding can be depicted without showing the actual suckling, being obstructed by the head for example.

The tag implication breast_suck -> suckling (forum #188549) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

bitwolfy said:
No.
I'm guessing that you do literally 0 research before providing your opinion.

It's a more complicated topic than just "yeah, sure, why not".
Breast suck and nipple suck imply sucking.
I don't know if suckling is a necessary tag at all, and it can be confused with sucking.

Breastfeeding can be depicted without showing the actual suckling, being obstructed by the head for example.

Coming back to this to say that, yes, you're absolutely right, breastfeeding can be depicted without actually showing anything being suckled/sucked.

On a seperate note, I must say that it was quite rude of you to assume that I do not do any research when providing my opinions. I simply misunderstood the greater aspect of the question. I am very passionate about e621, and I'm sure you are, too, being a former staff member. I am only doing my best to try and better the site as much as I can as an unprivileged user.

Although, next time I happen to vote on tag implications, I will try harder to consider all aspects of the implication.