Implicating nipple_bite → nipples
Link to implication

Reason:

Can't bite something that isn't there, after all.

EDIT: The tag implication nipple_bite -> nipples (forum #195952) has been approved by @SnowWolf.

But what if there are no nipples visible?

post #114014 post #396210 post #525828 post #525827

HotUnderTheCollar said:
But what if there are no nipples visible?

Well, under TWYS, if you wanted to split hairs (which, of course, no one ever does on the internet) since it doesn't show the nipple being bit then it doesn't count as a nipple bite.

Breast_bite does exist as a separate tag.
So, unless we want to alias those, the above examples should probably be tagged as that instead of nipple_bite.

The tag implication nipple_bite -> nipples (forum #195952) has been approved by @SnowWolf.