Implicating chakat → feline
Link to implication

Reason:

Chakats are feline-based taurs. It would make sense to implicate them as felines

Agreed. I think we should have foxtaur->fox or at the least foxtaur->canine as well

There's a problem in this: In canon, there is a subspecies of Chakat that is based on skunks, not felines.

Furrin_Gok said:
There's a problem in this: In canon, there is a subspecies of Chakat that is based on skunks, not felines.

i think that implying to mammal would suit better then.. unless theres scalie based chakats too

Mutisija said:
i think that implying to mammal would suit better then.. unless theres scalie based chakats too

As far as I can tell, they're all mammal, yes.

Furrin_Gok said:
There's a problem in this: In canon, there is a subspecies of Chakat that is based on skunks, not felines.

Those are 'Chakat-kin', not actual Chakats. In the lore they're a rival genetic engineering project, not a subspecies.

Chakat are always feline, therefore the implication seems fine.

Genjar said:
Those are 'Chakat-kin', not actual Chakats. In the lore they're a rival genetic engineering project, not a subspecies.

Chakat are always feline, therefore the implication seems fine.

People who don't really read into the deep lore (ie, me) won't know they're different species. Chakat skunk exists.

Furrin_Gok said:
Chakat skunk exists.

Four of those are group shots featuring Chakats with skunks/skunktaurs, and the fifth one seems like a hybrid. Considering the ears and face, I'd tag that as feline/skunk hybrid.

None of those break the implication, as far as I can see. And it's generally pretty easy to remember that Chakat are felines.