Bug
Editing an artist reverses the URL order

Expected behavior
When you go to an artist wiki, click "Edit" and then "Save", the URL's should remain in the same order as in the text box. Just like the URL's in a post's source field.

Actual behavior
e621 reverses the order. So if the URL's in the text box are:
http://prettysureitsclogged.tumblr.com/
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/downthedrainpipe/
http://thedrainpipe.deviantart.com/
Then clicking on "Save" puts them in this order:
http://thedrainpipe.deviantart.com/
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/downthedrainpipe/
http://prettysureitsclogged.tumblr.com/

Steps to duplicate
Go to any artist wiki: https://e621.net/artist/show/16060
Click "Edit", then "Save".

Congratulations, you completely destroyed Dmail.

Steps to reproduce: Send a dmail

Aurali said:
Congratulations, you completely destroyed Dmail.

Steps to reproduce: Send a dmail

Fixed.

On every browser I try it gives me "The site's security certificate is not trusted" and if i hit proceed anyway the site loads up but none of the images load.

Bug
URL translator fails for direct FA links if the username contains a period

Expected behavior
When you put this link in the source field of post #464691:
http://d.facdn.net/art/mr.pink/1396492835.mr.pink_kaaaaaaiijuuuuu.png

e621 should add this link to the sources:
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/mr.pink/

Actual behavior
e621 adds this link:
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/mr/

Steps to duplicate
1) Take an artist whose FA username contains a period
2) Take a direct link to one of his FA posts
3) Put the direct in in the source field of the corresponding e621 post

Bug: Can't get rid of the message at the top.

Steps to duplicate:

"Downtime!"
Go away, "X".
Refresh.
"April fools!"
Go away, "X".
Refresh.
"Downtime!"
Go away, "X".
Refresh.
"April fools!"

Expected behavior: If I hide a message, I should never see it again.

Actual behavior: I see it. I see two of them.

FeralBeast said:
Bug: Can't get rid of the message at the top.

Yeah, it's annoying. There's a fix ready that should at least make it much more tolerable until we can fix it for good (once you hide one notice, any notices before it are also hidden so you should never see a notice more than once).

Tony, dude, sorry. The error logs that were here were on my side. n_n;

When I access e621.net firefox gives me an error

"Secure Connection Failed

An error occurred during a connection to e621.net. The OCSP response is not yet valid (contains a date in the future). (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_future_response)"

yiffers99 said:
On every browser I try it gives me "The site's security certificate is not trusted" and if i hit proceed anyway the site loads up but none of the images load.

Check your system clock first. Security errors happen if the click is set to a different time, month, year, etc, than what it actually is.

CoffeeFly said:
Check your system clock first. Security errors happen if the click is set to a different time, month, year, etc, than what it actually is.

Really? Maybe this site should use a different protocol that isn't so susceptible to errors.

I, uh, broke something I think.

Uploaded post #466577 but it's acting pretty buggy.

I think my mistake was probably putting post links in the description (left them there as a note to whoever approves it). The post seems to be getting the comments for post #237995, and when I tried to edit my post to remove the description and update a couple tags it tried to edit 237995 as well.

Tried clearing my cache just to make sure things weren't going buggy on my end, but that didn't seem to fix anything. It's messed up on my phone's browser too.

Whoops?

Tokaido said:
I, uh, broke something I think.

Uploaded post #466577 but it's acting pretty buggy.

I think my mistake was probably putting post links in the description (left them there as a note to whoever approves it). The post seems to be getting the comments for post #237995, and when I tried to edit my post to remove the description and update a couple tags it tried to edit 237995 as well.

Tried clearing my cache just to make sure things weren't going buggy on my end, but that didn't seem to fix anything. It's messed up on my phone's browser too.

Whoops?

Wow, strange.

I've passed this along to our devs to see what they think. Thanks for letting us know!

Edit: Can at least confirm that it's definitely related to linking to posts in the description. I managed to mess up one of my own posts as a test: https://e621.net/post/show/114254/ Seems like whatever is the last post number you link to in the description is the post that you'll end up seeing the comments for, and ends up being the post that all the edit functions try to target...

Tokaido said:
I, uh, broke something I think. (...)

I managed to edit the post and replaced the post links with direct URLs.

Char said:
Wow, strange.

I've passed this along to our devs to see what they think. Thanks for letting us know!

Edit: Can at least confirm that it's definitely related to linking to posts in the description. I managed to mess up one of my own posts as a test: https://e621.net/post/show/114254/ Seems like whatever is the last post number you link to in the description is the post that you'll end up seeing the comments for, and ends up being the post that all the edit functions try to target...

That was my response as well. I was so baffled for a few minutes that I thought it just had to be on my end somehow. But now I know not to link posts in the description, at least until the issue is fixed.

EsalRider said:
I managed to edit the post and replaced the post links with direct URLs.

Oh, thank you so much!

There's been a serious problem going on with some posts that may or may not be popular/regularly visited, but whenever I go to these posts, the picture on the page is broken, and the link that says "Download" is a redirect taking me back to the same exact page. I really hope we can fix this. Thank you.

Also, if I'm breaking a rule according to the first post in this entire thread, I'm terribly sorry, but the ouroboros.ws bug page listed in that post won't open.

raisora144 said:
There's been a serious problem going on with some posts that may or may not be popular/regularly visited, but whenever I go to these posts, the picture on the page is broken, and the link that says "Download" is a redirect taking me back to the same exact page. I really hope we can fix this. Thank you.

Also, if I'm breaking a rule according to the first post in this entire thread, I'm terribly sorry, but the ouroboros.ws bug page listed in that post won't open.

I have been trying to find a pattern to the posts that won't load. They're not extremely rare (I'd say about 3% of the time it'll happen),and the post date/tags/uploader/rating have no bearing load rate at all. So...

Hyper_Beam said:
I have been trying to find a pattern to the posts that won't load. They're not extremely rare (I'd say about 3% of the time it'll happen),and the post date/tags/uploader/rating have no bearing load rate at all. So...

Glad to see someone's been doing something practical about this. Thanks for the info, and I hope a solution is found soon.

TheHuskyK9 said:
I've been having login trouble. It takes me a good 10 tries before I'm finally logged in

Wow, you´re very lucky! I have to change my password every time I want to login.

I know, the News says we don´t have to.....but it´s the only way it works for me

D4rk said:
Wow, you´re very lucky! I have to change my password every time I want to login.

I know, the News says we don´t have to.....but it´s the only way it works for me

login, logout, clear your e6 cookie, log back in.

D4rk said:
Wow, you´re very lucky! I have to change my password every time I want to login.

I know, the News says we don´t have to.....but it´s the only way it works for me

I have had to do that as well.

123easy said:
login, logout, clear your e6 cookie, log back in.

Oh, thanks. But somehow it seems to work now out of the sudden ¯\(o.0)/¯

D4rk said:
Oh, thanks. But somehow it seems to work now out of the sudden ¯\(o.0)/¯

none of that should really matter, seeing how the issue is their database running out of instances to give people. they must have bumped it up again. though I wonder if dragonfruit should get someone to monitor these things.

Aurali said:
none of that should really matter, seeing how the issue is their database running out of instances to give people. they must have bumped it up again. though I wonder if dragonfruit should get someone to monitor these things.

Yeah, no. Not even close.

For everyone else, please email the contact for website issues if you continue to experience problems. The core issue was resolved a few days ago, but lingering issues help us determine the bugs.

I'd like to report something c: I'm saying this because I feel a bit of tension from the two comments above :/

The comments on post #468443 are getting scrambled...

If I get them right, the order would be:

• comment #1474316 (Blackphantom770)

comment #1473888 (NochePerro)
comment #1474326 (Blackphantom770)
comment #1474146 (Mine)
comment #1474346 (Pooky1235) - Already reported

As I see, the ID's are wrong. Are they filling spaces of deleted comments?

Xch3l said:
I'd like to report something c: I'm saying this because I feel a bit of tension from the two comments above :/

The comments on post #468443 are getting scrambled...

If I get them right, the order would be:

• comment #1474316 (Blackphantom770)

comment #1473888 (NochePerro)
comment #1474326 (Blackphantom770)
comment #1474146 (Mine)
comment #1474346 (Pooky1235) - Already reported

As I see, the ID's are wrong. Are they filling spaces of deleted comments?

There are a bunch of hidden comments between them

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Yeah, no. Not even close.

It's the exact same symptoms as something you've run into three times before. PLEASE tell me you aren't just throwing untested configurations onto a production server?

Oh and you got some pretty easy to take advantage of exploits..

Aurali said:

It's the exact same symptoms as something you've run into three times before. PLEASE tell me you aren't just throwing untested configurations onto a production server?

Oh and you got some pretty easy to take advantage of exploits..

You need to immediately refrain from telling me what I need to do to appease you.

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
You need to immediately refrain from telling me what I need to do to appease you.

I have no idea what that has to do with any.. Am I unintentionally implying something I am not aware of?

Aurali said:

It's the exact same symptoms as something you've run into three times before. PLEASE tell me you aren't just throwing untested configurations onto a production server?

Oh and you got some pretty easy to take advantage of exploits..

Aurali, any HELP you can provide is appreciated, but please understand that you have not had access to e621's servers for at least half a year now. It's a bit misleading when you try to convince people that you know exactly what is going on, when you're not in a position to make claims like that anymore. It can end up being confusing for other users.

If you wish to inform an administrator in private regarding the exploits that you're aware of, we encourage you to do so, just like we would any user. It would be greatly appreciated!

Char said:
If you wish to inform an administrator in private regarding the exploits that you're aware of, we encourage you to do so, just like we would any user. It would be greatly appreciated!

It's already been handed over to someone. I'm not trying to start a fight. I'll refrain from commenting further

broken images. lots of them. copying image url doesn't work btw.

YiffySkunk said:
broken images. lots of them. copying image url doesn't work btw.

I've yet to encounter an example where copying the image URL and changing the HTTPS to HTTP didn't work. Could you link us to some of these?

Char said:
I've yet to encounter an example where copying the image URL and changing the HTTPS to HTTP didn't work. Could you link us to some of these?

oh, gotcha. I didn't notice the HTTPS. you're right, that works, thanks!

YiffySkunk said:
oh, gotcha. I didn't notice the HTTPS. you're right, that works, thanks!

Cool, no problem. Just wanted to make sure that there wasn't yet another factor to all this. :P

Outgoing mail sent by e621 is getting caught by spamfilters due to a lot of bad mail sending practices. Here are the headers of a recent message I was sent, showing the tests the message failed.

Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	imap2.ox.registrar-servers.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,HTML_MESSAGE,
	HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,
	TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Report: 
	*  2.3 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
	*  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
	*  0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
	* -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
	*      [score: 0.1466]
	*  0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
	*  0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
	*  1.4 TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY To: misformatted and HTML only
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from app1.e621.net (unknown [162.213.210.163])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9FB5A0094
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 04:46:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from e621.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by app1.e621.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3I8kF9p000441
	for <[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 01:46:15 -0700
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 01:46:15 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Subject: [SPAM-5.6]- e621 - Message received from dashingprince: hello i am person is friend
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: e621 - Message received from dashingprince: hello i am person is friend

I've seen these CloudFlare error codes recently. I thought they would be useful if I posted them here (I'm not sure about the Ray ID but I'll leave it in case it has something to do)

• Error 502: Bad gateway [Ray ID: 11d6fd0a8a9f0968]

Error 522: Connection timed out [Ray ID: 11d6ce6e64ed0105]
Error 525: SSL handshake failed [Ray ID: 11d6c8744d6a0105]

At least I know my browser and CloudFlare are working, but it seems that e6 is not configured correctly for it...

same here, that cloudflare error is much more common than that odd bug where clicking download on a pic keeps redirecting back to the same pic unless to change the https to http.

Error 522 Ray ID: 11de4590737f09d0 connection timed out

host error

the ID is different with each error but its usually the same 522 error for me and its always a host error when the page comes up as an error.

edit: refreshing a few times helps with some pages but sometimes it just loads real slowly or goes back to the error page again.

...come on, let me save this post edit ya dumb error page >:(

Xch3l said:
I've seen these CloudFlare error codes recently. I thought they would be useful if I posted them here (I'm not sure about the Ray ID but I'll leave it in case it has something to do)

• Error 502: Bad gateway [Ray ID: 11d6fd0a8a9f0968]

Error 522: Connection timed out [Ray ID: 11d6ce6e64ed0105]
Error 525: SSL handshake failed [Ray ID: 11d6c8744d6a0105]

At least I know my browser and CloudFlare are working, but it seems that e6 is not configured correctly for it...

Been noticing it too.

Error 522 Ray ID: 11de50a9bd290077
Connection timed out

Axelfox said:
Been noticing it too.

Error 522 Ray ID: 11de50a9bd290077
Connection timed out

They seem to be happening at around midnight (10Pm to 2Am). At least for me...

Xch3l said:
They seem to be happening at around midnight (10Pm to 2Am). At least for me...

Its happening to me in Seattle around 8:00pm untill midnight so in theory the same time as you but in diffrent timezones

EDIT: they have dissapered at 10:03pm PST so I don't know if the've been permantly resolved but i'd feel I should point it out

thatoneclarinetist said:
Its happening to me in Seattle around 8:00pm untill midnight so in theory the same time as you but in diffrent timezones

6:31PM Hawai'i time here.

I've been seeing all of these errors, plus one that reads 'Website is offline'. It's becoming next to impossible to post or even view images. And it does seem to get a lot worse at night, though I've gotten the error in the morning too.

Bug
DText can't handle square brackets in URL's

Expected behavior
This DText should create a direct link to an image on Furaffinity:

"direct link":http://d.facdn.net/art/kristen/1383777548.kristen_orgasmic_[-rc-].png

Actual behavior
Only the text before the opening square bracket is part of the link:
direct link

Steps to duplicate
See above.

A bug -
I get comments on my uploads that don't appear on this page - https://e621.net/comment?poster_id=83495

For example Kaze's comment on https://e621.net/post/show/473983 and NSFW's comment on https://e621.net/post/show/474129 (links may contain loli)

Munkelzahn said:
DText can't handle square brackets in URL's

You can get around that by replacing any character DText doesn't like with its percent-encoded equivalent. For your link that would be

http://d.facdn.net/art/kristen/1383777548.kristen_orgasmic_%5B-rc-%5D.png

And it works like this

Wyvrn said:
You can get around that by replacing any character DText doesn't like with its percent-encoded equivalent. For your link that would be

http://d.facdn.net/art/kristen/1383777548.kristen_orgasmic_%5B-rc-%5D.png

And it works like this
Hi can u help most of my favorite disapear is there a reason for That???

Only a few of your favourites are shown on your profile page. You can see the rest of them by clicking the » next to "Favorites" on your profile page, or by clicking "Favorites" in the top submenu of the Pots page, or by searching for the tag fav:JRobert567 or by clicking here.

Enkidu6 said:
A bug -
I get comments on my uploads that don't appear on this page - https://e621.net/comment?poster_id=83495

Turns out that happens when the first comment on a post is posted "without bumping". Then that comment won't show up on the post until another comment is made (without using the "post without bumping" option). I'm just going to remove that option entirely since it's useless so this should stop happening when I do that.

About the favorites being gone, I assume you mean you can only see one page of your favorites; there's no page 2 or 3 or whatever. Until we fix that, you can access more pages of favorites by changing the page number in the address bar. For example, change /post/index/1/fav%3Ausername to /post/index/2/fav%3Ausername

tony311 said:
[...]Until we fix that, you can access more pages of favorites by changing the page number in the address bar. For example, change /post/index/1/fav%3Ausername to /post/index/2/fav%3Ausername

I like the older method (which still works, btw) of /post/index?tags:fav%3Ausername&page=2

Xch3l said:
I like the older method (which still works, btw) of /post/index?tags:fav%3Ausername&page=2

JRobert567 said: ik all That but the problem Is That before i had 4000 and more and now i have only 1949 what can do to resolve this???

tony311 said:
Turns out that happens when the first comment on a post is posted "without bumping". Then that comment won't show up on the post until another comment is made (without using the "post without bumping" option). I'm just going to remove that option entirely since it's useless so this should stop happening when I do that.

About the favorites being gone, I assume you mean you can only see one page of your favorites; there's no page 2 or 3 or whatever. Until we fix that, you can access more pages of favorites by changing the page number in the address bar. For example, change /post/index/1/fav%3Ausername to /post/index/2/fav%3Ausername

Make sure what you are saying is at the bottom of the text box and is not [quote]Inside a quote block like this.[/quote] Otherwise it's very hard to read your posts. Also, my mistake on misinterpreting your problem, suddenly losing ~2000 of your ~4000 favourites is a strange issue indeed.

Bug
Placeholder for deleted images doesn't load

Expected behavior
The "deleted image" placeholder should display correctly:
https://e621.net/deleted-preview.png

Actual behavior
It doesn't load, and Firefox 29.0 displays a "broken image" placeholder instead.

Steps to duplicate
Take a look at my comments:
https://e621.net/comment/search?query=user%3AMunkelzahn
The (currently) topmost comment "It's so hard and strong!" is for a deleted image.

If you try to load the "deleted image" placeholder directly, e621 displays the "Nobody here but us chickens!" error message:
https://e621.net/deleted-preview.png

Bug:

Fixing the thumbnail doesn't work, no idea if only for this picture or for all.

Affected image: https://e621.net/post/show/478707

Expected Behavior:

Clinking the link fixes the thumbnail

Actual behavior:

It does say it fixed it, but it does not show up fixed.
(Hard reload of the page doesn't change anything)

Steps to duplicate:
Click https://e621.net/post/show/478707, click "Fix Thumbnail"

Attempt to connect to site:

e621.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: ssl2431.cloudflare.com, *.asianfanfics.com, *.findtoilet.co, asianfanfics.com, psim.us, zerotackle.com, *.zerotackle.com, *.boltsecuring.com, *.bookloversmarket.com, wybierzpis.org.pl, maxkitap.com, *.psim.us, *.targetfocustraining.com, devs.com.au, unicoach.de, boltsecuring.com, manofmany.com, *.maxkitap.com, *.monamismoothclear.com, validsafe.com, bernsteinslaw.com, *.unicoach.de, *.validsafe.com, *.devs.com.au, findtoilet.co, *.wybierzpis.org.pl, sexoenwebcam.com, *.bernsteinslaw.com, fenris.cc, monamismoothclear.com, bookloversmarket.com, bullysticks.co, *.bullysticks.co, targetfocustraining.com, reallygoodfakes.com, *.sexoenwebcam.com, *.fenris.cc, *.manofmany.com, *.reallygoodfakes.com (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)

123easy said:
findtoilet.co

Wat.

Oh, and it's a missing image again.

https://e621.net/deleted-preview.png

I've had tag edits not "take" the last couple of days. I've tried to remove "feral" from image # 481138 three times now and it's still there -- no one is reverting my edit, it's just not taking. Inage #481134 is the same way.

Woozle said:
I've had tag edits not "take" the last couple of days. I've tried to remove "feral" from image # 481138 three times now and it's still there -- no one is reverting my edit, it's just not taking. Inage #481134 is the same way.

It also had the "bestiality" tag which adds back the feral tag. I've removed both of the tags on both of the images.

Woozle said:
I've had tag edits not "take" the last couple of days. I've tried to remove "feral" from image # 481138 three times now and it's still there -- no one is reverting my edit, it's just not taking. Inage #481134 is the same way.

Those are tagged as bestiality, which implies feral. So if you're trying to untag feral without also removing bestiality, it'll just get instantly retagged.

Genjar said:
Those are tagged as bestiality, which implies feral. So if you're trying to untag feral without also removing bestiality, it'll just get instantly retagged.

Excellent, that is useful information. Thank you. I should have checked the tags for that sort of thing, but mistagged "ferals" is a bee in my bonnet and I fixated on it.

There textbox wrap error (or bug). It doesn't try wrap lines at all if it doesn't meet whitespace in text.
Screenshot of example:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/bj9dcc9i19tugbl/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%82%202014-05-18%2014.49.37.png

And test on normal, non-url text
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

Swiftkill said:
There textbox wrap error (or bug). It doesn't try wrap lines at all if it doesn't meet whitespace in text.
Screenshot of example:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/bj9dcc9i19tugbl/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%82%202014-05-18%2014.49.37.png

And test on normal, non-url text
<<CUT>>

Seems to be browser specific: http://i.imgur.com/jF2K3ER.png (this is Comodo Dragon 33)
Though the text does not wrap automatically on Chrome for Android either.

Two things about the API:

First: In the documentation https://e621.net/help/api Tags -> Related

type Restrict results to this tag type (can be general, artist, copyright, species, or species).

So... is there a difference between species and species?

Second: I think I don't quite understand how querying tags works.
I expected it to work like this: https://e621.net/tag/index.xml?order=name&limit=100&page=4
But it doesn't matter what I set the page-parameter to, it always returns the same page. I assume "limit" limits the total amount of tags found. But how can I set the page size then? Setting "limit" to 0 would return all tags at once, but that just times out like expected.
Also, how can I get the number of existing tags? Currently, I can't determine how many pages I have to query.

Swiftkill said:
There textbox wrap error (or bug). It doesn't try wrap lines at all if it doesn't meet whitespace in text.

Calimero000 said:
First: In the documentation https://e621.net/help/api Tags -> Related

type Restrict results to this tag type (can be general, artist, copyright, species, or species).

So... is there a difference between species and species?

Calimero000 said:
But it doesn't matter what I set the page-parameter to, it always returns the same page.

All fixed in the next update.

Calimero000 said:
Also, how can I get the number of existing tags? Currently, I can't determine how many pages I have to query.

No way to do that yet, sorry :(

No way to do that yet, sorry :(

Shouldn't that be just a small change? There has to be some way, because on this page: https://e621.net/tag it shows the number of pages too (2481 in this case).

Anyways thanks for getting round to it.

Not much of a bug report, but... the site has been running extremely slow for me recently. For a week or so. Today it's so bad that even most tag combo searches refuse to load at all.

I wonder if it has anything to do with that constant flood of empty tag edits? Many posts have couple of pages of those by now, which incidentally makes it hard to figure out who's mistagging things: the first page of tag history is usually full of blank edits, and we can't view the other pages.

post #485193 has a corrupted thumbnail.

I'm still getting constant CloudFlare errors (between London <-> e621.net). I can barely get any work done, because tag scripting fails to work most of the time and combo searches usually time out.

Genjar said:
I'm still getting constant CloudFlare errors (between London <-> e621.net). I can barely get any work done, because tag scripting fails to work most of the time and combo searches usually time out.

same on my end mine is diffrent though sometimes its:

Seattle <-> e621

or for some odd reason I can't figure out almost all the time its:

San Jose <-> e621

I figure if its happening in London or where you are and to me in Seattle where I live it must be e6 itself though i'm no expert...

Getting random, intermittent 404 pages when preforming a search. Screenshot.

It doesn't seem to be tied to any particular tag as far as I can tell. At first I thought it was whenever I searched "gif" but it seems to just pick and choose when not to work. Not sure if this helps, but I'm using Chrome browser. It also seems to be about 1 out of every 4 searches or less.

EDIT: Also using Ch3l's e6 script as well, as you probably guessed from the screenshot :P

Tokaido said:
Getting random, intermittent 404 pages when preforming a search. Screenshot.

It doesn't seem to be tied to any particular tag as far as I can tell. At first I thought it was whenever I searched "gif" but it seems to just pick and choose when not to work. Not sure if this helps, but I'm using Chrome browser. It also seems to be about 1 out of every 4 searches or less.

EDIT: Also using Ch3l's e6 script as well, as you probably guessed from the screenshot :P

Searches ending with gif, png, jpg or swf (and maybe some other known formats) might throw a 404 error. For example, you can safely search for type:swf game, but not for game type:swf. Seems like this lingering issue with searches ending in file extensions is being fixed, but sometimes it's still happening (a server not synchronized properly, maybe?). To circumvent it, put a "/" to the end of the URL in the address bar whenever you get a 404 and it doesn't want to go away.

EsalRider said:
Searches ending with gif, png, jpg or swf (and maybe some other known formats) might throw a 404 error. For example, you can safely search for type:swf game, but not for game type:swf. Seems like this lingering issue with searches ending in file extensions is being fixed, but sometimes it's still happening (a server not synchronized properly, maybe?). To circumvent it, put a "/" to the end of the URL in the address bar whenever you get a 404 and it doesn't want to go away.

I though the gif tag might have something to do with it, but jpg, swf, png, and those kinds of tags seemed to work just fine. I must have just gotten (un?)lucky. But putting "gif animated" also seemed to throw a 404 sometimes, not just "animated gif" *shrug*

Anyway, thanks, now I know, and knowing is blah blah blah

So I've been trying to upload this for 2 weeks and after not seeing this fixed today and not a single post on the forums I've decided to try posting here.
Attempting an upload always returns a PHP error. Here's an image.

post #489211 is completely broken. The image can only be seen through the source URL.