Implicating bloomers → underwear
Link to implication
Reason:
Bloomers are a type of underwear.
EDIT: The tag implication bloomers -> underwear (forum #213736) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: Tag Implication: bloomers -> underwear
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Bloomers aren't only underwear. Wikipedia has a long history on bloomers that I can't be bothered to read.
Maybe bottomwear would be a better target?
Edit 2023-05-15: This now implies bottomwear, this can be rejected now.
Updated
The tag implication bloomers -> underwear (forum #213736) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
Implying to bottomwear does sound like a better plan. And since that's already done, closing this just seems prudent.
Updated by furrypickle