Implicating lion_sora → alternate_species
Link to implication

Reason:

Interestingly, this is the exact reverse of the "we don't tag species for characters" thing :P

EDIT: The tag implication lion_sora -> alternate_species (forum #223484) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Sora has a known species, though, as a lion. Would alternate species qualify if the "character" has their own name? The wiki says "normal", which can be interpreted as "one of" or "just the" normal.

The wiki might want to be reworded, while being possessive of character is intuitive, shapeshifters and etc. wouldn't be known for many alternate forms.

-1. Lion Sora'so official species is Lion, and he can be depicted as one or not (ie: wolf, fox, hyena).

Furrin_Gok said:
-1. Lion Sora'so official species is Lion, and he can be depicted as one or not (ie: wolf, fox, hyena).

I'm pretty sure if that were the case, any sensible user would tag it with sora (kindgom hearts) alone without even considering Lion_sora.

Circeus said:
I'm pretty sure if that were the case, any sensible user would tag it with sora (kindgom hearts) alone without even considering Lion_sora.

Nope. That's tagging what you know, not see. Sora's Lion and Mermaid forms are "Separate Characters." Anti-sora too.

There was some talk of creating umbrella tags for those, for maximum searchability. Like this:

• sora_(kingdom_hearts)
• sora_(human)
• lion_sora
• (other forms?)

• link
• link_(humanoid)
• link_(wolf_form)
• (other forms)

But that'd require extra tagging and implications, and therefore it probably isn't high priority.

Genjar said:
There was some talk of creating umbrella tags for those, for maximum searchability. Like this:

• sora_(kingdom_hearts)
• sora_(human)
• lion_sora
• (other forms?)

• link
• link_(humanoid)
• link_(wolf_form)
• (other forms)

But that'd require extra tagging and implications, and therefore it probably isn't high priority.

I don't like "Human." "Human-form" maybe, it'd fit with the other tags, but I like "standard-form" better, as then we can fit it in with any other characters, included those who's standard forms aren't human.

Furrin_Gok said:
I don't like "Human." "Human-form" maybe, it'd fit with the other tags, but I like "standard-form" better, as then we can fit it in with any other characters, included those who's standard forms aren't human.

That's a good idea. One problem with the tree structure was that characters such as Link can be either humanoid or human by twys. Because the ears aren't always visible. Tagging both as link_(standard_form) would solve that problem.

hope there's a car_sora in kingdom hearts 3 and he has to race lighting McQueen and he beata him so hard lighting McQueen crashes

memeboy said:
hope there's a car_sora in kingdom hearts 3 and he has to race lighting McQueen and he beata him so hard lighting McQueen crashes

Knowing Kingdom Hearts, and Sora, just as one of them is about to win, some stupid stuff goes down and the race gets cancelled. Sora just shrugs (As a car?) it off and tells McQueen it was his (McQueen's) win anyways.
Then Riku gives him a bump on the side and tells him he's too soft.

The tag implication lion_sora -> alternate_species (forum #223484) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.