Implicating huge_dildo → dildo
Link to implication

Reason:

Should we really have this tag? Characters come in different sizes, so how do we know just by looking at the image that the character isn't small, with a regular sized dildo?

Furrin_Gok said:
Should we really have this tag? Characters come in different sizes, so how do we know just by looking at the image that the character isn't small, with a regular sized dildo?

I guess that’s more about perspective.
I still believe that some people might find it useful.

Silverflame said:
I guess that’s more about perspective.
I still believe that some people might find it useful.

Yeah, I'm actually +1 for keeping it, but I do want to know where others stand on it.

Wasn’t there another tag called hyper_dildo with dildo’s as big as the furry using it? I still can remember a fox putting one of those in her vagina but I can’t find the image anymore.

Apparently that tag still exist.

(I know this is a difficult tag considering almost all dildo’s in furry porn are huge.)

Furrin_Gok said:
Yeah, I'm actually +1 for keeping it, but I do want to know where others stand on it.

You're supposed to sit on it, not stand on it.

More seriously, does the absolute size matter? Consider how *_breasts is measured -- relative to head size, discernability, or ability to carry.
I think it would be reasonable to define huge_dildo in relation to the hip width of the character using it.

Hyper_dildo seems more dubious.

savageorange said:

Hyper_dildo seems more dubious.

No more dubious than anything else hyper on this website.

AnotherDay said:
No more dubious than anything else hyper on this website.

No, look.. Hyper is typically applied to actual body parts with physically impossible proportions. There is nothing impossible about having a building-sized dildo.