Implicating switch_dog → nintendo_switch
Link to implication

Reason:

Switch dog is basically an anthro version of the Nintendo Switch "Gamepad" mode, using the handgrips as dog ears.

Makes sense I guess. +1

Also, we need nintendo_switch to imply nintendo.

And game_console.

BlueDingo said:
And game_console.

That's a bit iffy:
post #1026674
The logo here would get the tag alone, without the console being present

Furrin_Gok said:
That's a bit iffy:
post #1026674
The logo here would get the tag alone, without the console being present

I think they meant the Switch Dog, not Nintendo Switch as whole.

BlueDingo said:
And game_console.

Wouldn't controller parts being used in that docking thing make the dog a controller?

Nintendo Switch is an odd case in that it's default state involves both the console and the controllers together. Divided up, you could tag console and controller separately but joined together, you probably wouldn't bother acknowledging the controllers as controllers.

BlueDingo said:
Nintendo Switch is an odd case in that it's default state involves both the console and the controllers together. Divided up, you could tag console and controller separately but joined together, you probably wouldn't bother acknowledging the controllers as controllers.

That was similar to my thinking.
However should the Dog be tagged as controller even? I would guess that animate_inanimate fits it far better and you could then seperately search images where there's an actual controllers on top of them:
post #1037114

Especially when some images have taken so much liberty it's almost not visible them being controller anymore, but some electronic device or toy:
post #1101686