Implicating large_group → group
Link to implication
Reason:
Mathematically speaking, if there's at least 10 characters then there's at least 3 characters. x≥10 ⇒ x≥3.
Updated by Genjar
Topic: Tag Implication: large_group -> group
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Can't argue with the maths, 10 ≥ 3. +1
I didn't know we had a large_group.
Updated by anonymous
BlueDingo said:
Can't argue with the maths, 10 ≥ 3. +1I didn't know we had a large_group.
Likewise, but it was added five (or seven) months ago. Should it stay?
Updated by anonymous
Siral_Exan said:
Likewise, but it was added five (or seven) months ago. Should it stay?
I don't see why not, plus mass_orgy is impilcated to it.
Updated by anonymous
BlueDingo said:
I don't see why not, plus mass_orgy is impilcated to it.
It looks like Genjar knew of it, so I'll put my trust in that.
Updated by anonymous
It was created as a mid-tier alternative to the absolutely_everyone tag.
The threshold of ten characters might seem a bit arbitrary, but that was chosen because it's the point where it generally gets difficult to count the characters. So you can usually see at a glance if the tag applies.
Anyway, plus one.
Thought that it's already implicated, but looks like only the ones that are chained through mass_orgy are.
Updated by anonymous