Implicating large_group → group
Link to implication

Reason:

Mathematically speaking, if there's at least 10 characters then there's at least 3 characters. x≥10 ⇒ x≥3.

Can't argue with the maths, 10 ≥ 3. +1

I didn't know we had a large_group.

BlueDingo said:
Can't argue with the maths, 10 ≥ 3. +1

I didn't know we had a large_group.

Likewise, but it was added five (or seven) months ago. Should it stay?

Siral_Exan said:
Likewise, but it was added five (or seven) months ago. Should it stay?

I don't see why not, plus mass_orgy is impilcated to it.

BlueDingo said:
I don't see why not, plus mass_orgy is impilcated to it.

It looks like Genjar knew of it, so I'll put my trust in that.

It was created as a mid-tier alternative to the absolutely_everyone tag.

The threshold of ten characters might seem a bit arbitrary, but that was chosen because it's the point where it generally gets difficult to count the characters. So you can usually see at a glance if the tag applies.

Anyway, plus one.
Thought that it's already implicated, but looks like only the ones that are chained through mass_orgy are.