Implicating seashell_bra → bra
Link to implication

Reason:

A seashell bra is a bra made of seashells.

Related:

• seashell_bra I-> seashell

EDIT: The tag implication seashell_bra -> bra (forum #222059) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Should also imply either seashell or mollusk_shell but not sure which

The tag implication seashell_bra -> bra (forum #222059) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

The bulk update request #6076 is active.

create implication seashell_bra (588) -> bra (67236)

Reason: It is a bra

EDIT: The bulk update request #6076 (forum #385377) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6076 (forum #385377) has been approved by @slyroon.

So what happened here? One mod rejected it and then another one approved it a month later?

Anyway, the reason I'm here is to dispute this. It's a "bra" only in the sense of being a thing that covers the breasts and nothing else. It could just as easily be considered a bikini top, but English speakers had to settle on one term or another and this one was shorter. Bigger issue is that "bra" is already aliased to "underwear" for obvious reasons, and I think it would be a stretch to say Ariel is swimming around in her skivvies.

To say nothing of how often the tag and its starfish counterpart are being used for what is essentially pasties instead.

errorist said:
So what happened here? One mod rejected it and then another one approved it a month later?

NoMeNotYou was rejecting a lot of years-old alias/implication requests that were piling up. Ones that still seem relevant (apparently good, and not already done elsewhere) can be remade to be reconsidered.