Topic: Tag Alias: female_human -> invalid_tag

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Can I suggest male_focus and female_focus here? It is counterintuitive to what the *_focus tags are meant to represent: more females than X, a single female that is the focus, possibly more?

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
Can I suggest male_focus and female_focus here? It is counterintuitive to what the *_focus tags are meant to represent: more females than X, a single female that is the focus, possibly more?

This may've come from Danbooru. They sorta use male_focus for the same thing we use male for.

We could alias those to male and female respectively.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
Can I suggest male_focus and female_focus here? It is counterintuitive to what the *_focus tags are meant to represent: more females than X, a single female that is the focus, possibly more?

If I understand the statement correctly, the problem was it didn't matter if it was focused on the fact it was female or not, as long as there was a female human in the image it was tagged with female_human, which is why the tag needed to be sweeped under the carpet.

Updated by anonymous

Chaser said:
If I understand the statement correctly, the problem was it didn't matter if it was focused on the fact it was female or not, as long as there was a female human in the image it was tagged with female_human, which is why the tag needed to be sweeped under the carpet.

No, as in "can we get rid of these too, here, because of *reasons*."

Updated by anonymous

Mutisija said:
no need to invalidate it, just alias it to human instead

That works too, didn't think about that.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1