Implicating mascara_tears → running_makeup
Link to implication

Reason:

Should also alias/implicate running_mascara and mascara_tears.

EDIT: The tag implication mascara_tears -> running_makeup (forum #222901) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

JAKXXX3 said:
Implicating mascara_tears → running_makeup
Link to implication

Reason:

Should also alias/implicate running_mascara and mascara_tears.

mascara_tears I-> running_mascara I-> running_makeup sounds better to me. All instances of mascara tears involve running mascara.

Should we add mascara_tears I-> tears to that?

BlueDingo said:
mascara_tears I-> running_mascara I-> running_makeup sounds better to me. All instances of mascara tears involve running mascara.

+1.

BlueDingo said:
Should we add mascara_tears I-> tears to that?

Probably, I can't imagine any situation in which this don't fit. Only to confirm, the act of forcing liquids (e.g. juice, milk etc) through the lacrimal ducts still resulting in "tears", don't it?

BlueDingo said:
mascara_tears I-> running_mascara I-> running_makeup sounds better to me. All instances of mascara tears involve running mascara.

Should we add mascara_tears I-> tears to that?

I think we should alias mascara tears and running mascara. When would it be the case that they aren't one and the same?

Furrin_Gok said:
I think we should alias mascara tears and running mascara. When would it be the case that they aren't one and the same?

When someone throws water at the person's face, for example.

Or if they apply an absurd amount of it.

O16 said:
When someone throws water at the person's face, for example.

BlueDingo said:
Or if they apply an absurd amount of it.

They are functionally the same by e621 tagging.

Furrin_Gok said:
They are functionally the same by e621 tagging.

Yeah, searching running_mascara + tears or crying would serve the same function as mascara_tears. So long as posts are correctly tagged, aliasing mascara_tears instead of implicating it would simplify things without any loss of functionality.

JAKXXX3 said:
Yeah, searching running_mascara + tears or crying would serve the same function as mascara_tears. So long as posts are correctly tagged, aliasing mascara_tears instead of implicating it would simplify things without any loss of functionality.

I can live with that, provided users remember to put the tears tag in where applicable. More don't than do right now.
(119 with tears vs. 168 without)

Bumping to prevent automatic rejection.

running_mascara should definitely imply running_makeup. Mascara is makeup so if your mascara is running then you have running makeup.

Something should still be done about mascara_tears, either imply or aliased to running_mascara.

The tag implication mascara_tears -> running_makeup (forum #222901) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.