Implicating pangolin_love → google_doodle
Link to implication

Reason:

Pangolin Love is a Google Doodle.

I also am suggesting the new pseudo-names for the pangolins:
Red (Pangolin Love) -> Pangolin Love
Purple (Pangolin Love) -> Pangolin Love

Despite janitor status I am still unsure how to properly do tag implication suggestions. Do I need to create a new implication suggestion for Red (Pangolin Love) and Purple (Pangolin Love), or are those created and handled by the admin whom approves/denies the first one?

Chaser said:
Despite janitor status I am still unsure how to properly do tag implication suggestions. Do I need to create a new implication suggestion for Red (Pangolin Love) and Purple (Pangolin Love), or are those created and handled by the admin whom approves/denies the first one?

Admins can do it.

Chaser said:
Do I need to create a new implication suggestion for Red (Pangolin Love) and Purple (Pangolin Love), or are those created and handled by the admin whom approves/denies the first one?

Sticking them in the body of the OP is usually fine. Just make sure they are all...you know related to the OP otherwise it obscures finding it in the alias/implication indexes.

Gosh darn it, nothing is safe from R34

Can you add momo_(google) to that list?

TheHuskyK9 said:
Gosh darn it, nothing is safe from R34

as the rule says, no exceptions. :P

treos said:
as the rule says, no exceptions. :P

What about these?

BlueDingo said:
What about these?

That's rule 34b. If it doesn't exist, get on it (literally if you must).

parasprite said:
That's rule 34b.

Rule 35. Yeah from the same list.