Implicating cum_on_beak → beak
Link to implication

Reason:

I can't think of any valid alternative to this tag, and it's been tagged over 70 times now. So might as well implicate it.

...oh, and implication to cum, too.

+1

Wait a sec.

Isn't there already a "cum_on_face" tag? Wouldn't that be redundant with "cum_on_beak" since the beak forms part of the face?

+1 for the first suggestion. It is logical.

Kavellrist said:
Wait a sec.

Isn't there already a "cum_on_face" tag? Wouldn't that be redundant with "cum_on_beak" since the beak forms part of the face?

On one hand this makes sence, on another we already have some kind of "special treatment" for beaks ("beakjob"). In that case, maybe would be better to imply "cum_on_beak" to "cum_on_face" (implying "cum" indirectly).

O16 said:
+1 for the first suggestion. It is logical.

On one hand this makes sence, on another we already have some kind of "special treatment" for beaks ("beakjob"). In that case, maybe would be better to imply "cum_on_beak" to "cum_on_face" (implying "cum" indirectly).

I actually don't get the whole differentiating "beakjob" from "blowjob" or "oral sex" thing, but whatever.

Kavellrist said:
I actually don't get the whole differentiating "beakjob" from "blowjob" or "oral sex" thing, but whatever.

Some people prefer having their dick scraped over sucked.

BlueDingo said:
Some people prefer having their dick scraped over sucked.

Seems like a mild form of CBT, frankly.

BlueDingo said:
Some people prefer having their dick scraped over sucked.

post #428529
OR beaksheaths

Approved the following:

• `cum_on_beak` -> `cum` & `beak`

• `cum_in_beak` -> beak & `cum_in_mouth` (implying cum and cum_inside by proxy)

• `cum_on_snout` -> cum

The cum_on_snout implication is a quick fix until I can determine whether or not to alias it to cum_on_face.

I'm not sure about cum_on_beak implying cum_on_face. We should probably discuss the nature of beaks/snouts and faces on another thread.

:3 Hello sexy beakjob tags