Implicating slit_play → genital_slit
Link to implication

Reason:

for slit play to occur, one character must have a slit.

as well, slit_penetration slit_sex slit_fingering, and slit_oral should all imply genital slit, correct me if I'm wrong...

EDIT: The tag implication slit_play -> genital_slit (forum #227007) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

I am unsure if orifices (slit, cloaca, pussy/vagina, uretra and anus) shold be implicated to their respectives sexual acts, since they may be non-visible in the post. In another hand, slit stimulations would fall into "ambiguous_penetration" if non-visible, so +1 I guess.

Unrelated question: why exactly do we use "penis" rather than "cock", but still using "pussy" rather than "vagina"?

O16 said:
Unrelated question: why exactly do we use "penis" rather than "cock", but still using "pussy" rather than "vagina"?

Vagina is just the internal genital tube. Whereas pussy includes all the external parts such as the labia.

Genjar said:
Vagina is just the internal genital tube. Whereas pussy includes all the external parts such as the labia.

It is fair.

Genjar said:
Vagina is just the internal genital tube. Whereas pussy includes all the external parts such as the labia.

Then why not vulva?

MissChu said:
Then why not vulva?

I also thought that initially, however a term applicable for both, external and internal regions (vagina and vulva, respectively) really is better.

^
This is near precisely why we use pussy. It is just a term for a combination of internal & eternal parts.

O16 said:
I also thought that initially, however a term applicable for both, external and internal regions (vagina and vulva, respectively) really is better.

Vagulva! Vulgina? Vagva.

The tag implication slit_play -> genital_slit (forum #227007) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.