Topic: paw_fetish should not imply foot_fetish

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

accursedCursive said:
I love paw_fetish images, but hate foot_fetish images.

Paws are the same thing as feet, just blacklist foot_fetish -paw_fetish

Updated by anonymous

Paws are a type of feet.

On that note, hoof_fetish is apparently a tag and could reasonably be implicated to foot_fetish (and yes I understand that hooves are modified toenails, but ultimately it's similar enough).

If we had some term for humanlike feet, we could have a [blank]_fetish tag for that, but we don't so we can't.

Also, probably ought not say this because it's not really relevant, but man do I not understand how people can find humanlike feet attractive. I can understand a lot of fetishes that I don't have - I sort of get vore, and even stuff like watersports and scat, but I just don't understand how those wrinkly fleshlumps at the end of legs could be, not just attractive, but the focus of a fetish.

Updated by anonymous

Clawdragons said:
Paws are a type of feet.

What about forepaws -- paws that are on the arms of a biped critter, but clearly aren't "hands"?

Updated by anonymous

I think foot_fetish works well as a tag for all kinds of feet and to just minus what you don't want to see.

Updated by anonymous

parasprite said:
Or do -feet.

Also foot_fetish paw probably returns results similar to paw_fetish (just more of them).

paw_fetish paw and foot_fetish paw are exactly the same.
Also, paw_fetish paw still returns largely feet images, because there's a lot of feet images tagged with "paws".

Updated by anonymous

accursedCursive said:
paw_fetish paw and foot_fetish paw are exactly the same.
Also, paw_fetish paw still returns largely feet images, because there's a lot of feet images tagged with "paws".

I think it's actually because paw_fetish is actually aliased to foot_fetish so the results of both searches should be the same.

I'm kinda neutral on paw vs foot fetish, but I think some foot-aliased-paw tags ought to be unaliased. For instance-'cum_on_paws' is aliased to cum_on_feet. A cum_on_paw tag exists, but likely isn't official since it's not well used. cum_on_hoof is meanwhile allowed to be distinct from the foot tag.

Unaliasing cum_on_paws from cum_on_feet would allow images like this to be tagged without adding them to an unrelated foot tag:
post #1103877 post #906234 post #789697
(These are currently tagged with the cum_on_paw tag, but again, I'm unsure that it's not supposed to be aliased to the foot tag)

It would also allow cum_on_foot to imply foot which is currently undertagged in cum_on_foot images.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1