Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating cum_inflation → excessive_cum
Link to implication
To achieve such levels of cum that it inflates another visably can be considered excessive cum.
EDIT: The tag implication cum_inflation -> excessive_cum (forum #233484) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator
I think excessive_cum is used when you can visibly see the cum and the mess it has caused.
The implication wouldn't work for posts like these where the cum is not visible or not visibly excessive,
post #1206316post #1183808post #1167706post #1169805post #1176505post #1201680post #1191296post #1191176
Updated by anonymous
cum inflation could be caused by a horse blowing a normal normal load into a mouse.
Updated by anonymous
Ledian said:
cum inflation could be caused by a horse blowing a normal normal load into a mouse.
It's all relative, isn't it? A giant's cum would be normal for them but excessive for us.
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication cum_inflation -> excessive_cum (forum #233484) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
