Implicating armpit_sex → armpit_fetish
Link to implication

Also:
armpit_licking --> Armpit_fetish
armpit_sniffing --> armpit_fetish

Reason:

Similar to the way foot tags and foot fetish is already implicated.

-1 for armpit_sniffing. A person could be sniffing their armpits to figure out if they stink without considering it a good thing. See post #664123

Furrin_Gok said:
-1 for armpit_sniffing. A person could be sniffing their armpits to figure out if they stink without considering it a good thing. See post #664123

That's one post which you just tagged a few minutes ago, but every other image with the tag is highly, HIGHLY fetishized.

Eppleblam said:
That's one post which you just tagged a few minutes ago, but every other image with the tag is highly, HIGHLY fetishized.

That's the only post I can rembember the tags to that had somebody sniffing their armpit without it being fetishistic. It's a useful tag outside of fetish display.

If that one very rare exception does throw all of this off, then the images without explicitly-fetishistic foot licking, like in post #436688, should also weight against it.

Also, I think that users who are interested in "armpit_fetish" would also want to see images like the one you provided.

I could be wrong however. We'll see what the admins think.

Now looking at this again, I'll remove the "cum_on_armpit" tag from the request, as there area few pictures without it being part of an armpit fetish. Just some cum that got on them. Examples like post #158625 and post #234416.

Approved OP.

Hesitant on the other two suggestions.