Implicating sven_the_giramon → sven_(character)
Link to implication

Reason:

both seem to be the same character.

EDIT: The tag implication sven_the_giramon -> sven_(character) (forum #238319) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Dont you mean Alias? Also it would likely be better as a reverse alias if anything. Name implications are gonna be bad to begin with and ther may be other characters that rise with the name sven so that would likely not be a good idea either.

The logical step is to do tag cleanup and try to keep them separate.

Bad Idea. -1

Demesejha said:
Dont you mean Alias? Also it would likely be better as a reverse alias if anything. Name implications are gonna be bad to begin with and ther may be other characters that rise with the name sven so that would likely not be a good idea either.

The logical step is to do tag cleanup and try to keep them separate.

Bad Idea. -1

Agreed, Sven is a decently-common Norwegian name, another character could come along with the same name in the future.

Also: sven_(character) should be aliased to just 'sven', as I am not aware of any use of the word other than as a personal name.

Considering that the first town you can explore in Skyrim has a bard in it named Sven, yeah, easy enough name for characters to have.

i just checked and it looks like vee4eve is the character owner so maybe drop the sven_(character) tag and just add _(vee4eva) to the sven_the_giramon tag?

common names are irritating to sort out in regards to character name tagging. actually, the above might be the best option because if we just alias these to "sven" then sooner or later we'll just end up with multiple different characters with that name coming up in the search results and needing disambiguating.

is already a fairly unique name. Why not just stick with that?

We already have sven (frozen). Sven is too common of a name, so per everyone else.

The tag implication sven_the_giramon -> sven_(character) (forum #238319) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.