Aliasing slit_sex → slit_penetration
Link to alias

Reason:

Both are separate tags, but Slit penetration more closely follows the nomenclature already established in tags

EDIT: The tag alias slit_sex -> slit_penetration (forum #240359) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The tag alias slit_sex -> slit_penetration (forum #240359) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

I don't think this was correct. slit_sex included quite a few cases that were not penetration, as described in the wiki. If anything, it should have been aliased to slit_play. post #2819585, for instance.

scth said:
I don't think this was correct. slit_sex included quite a few cases that were not penetration, as described in the wiki. If anything, it should have been aliased to slit_play. post #2819585, for instance.

Seconded, non-penetrative sex is still sex, so this shouldn't have been approved.

scth said:
I don't think this was correct. slit_sex included quite a few cases that were not penetration, as described in the wiki. If anything, it should have been aliased to slit_play. post #2819585, for instance.

I wouldn't consider that slit_sex. That would be after_sex, so sex/slit_sex isn't happening in the image.

Though I agree I don't think this is correct. One character fingering or fisting another character's slit would be sex/slit_sex, and isn't penetration according to the current definition. One character using a vibrator on another's slit, or otherwise stimulating the outside of the slit and it being depicted as erogenous, would be slit_sex without any penetration.

But at the same time, anal_sex and vaginal_sex have also been aliased to their *_penetration counterparts, so it is at least consistent, even though they share the same issue of non-penetration sex.