Topic: Tag Implication: furgonomic_armor (+ other) -> furgonomics

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

I) Make more sense for 'furgonomic_clothing' to be an umbrella tag for the footwear, headwear and armor¹ variations.

II) 'tail_sting' and 'horn_ring' are supposed to be subsets² of 'tail_ornament' and 'horn_ornament', respectively, hence is more logical to imply these two former instead.

III) We probably should avail this opportunity to fix the 'tail_clothing' tag. It currently encompasses garments worn on tail and adapted bottomwear.

IV) Tail ornaments not even were mentioned, I don't think that was intentional.

¹ See forum #237555.
² See forum #238502.

-/-/-/-/-/-/-

May a privileged or higher level user repeat the following text please? it would be easier to understand if colored.

Suggested implication tree:

→ --- already implicated
→ --- not implicated yet

¹ Attempt of sorting 'tail_clothing'.

Updated by anonymous

bpedron said:
I'd like to bring this discussion back, because there still isn't an implication for furgonomic_bottomwear > furgonomics.

Since, this thread (and the main thread) is already several years old, you can try developing an updated tag tree with all the related furgonomic_* tags and request a BUR to imply them all at once.

  • 1