Topic: Tag Implication: cosmic_wings -> unusual_wings

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Stuff where the wings actually look like they're made out of cosmic material certainly qualify, but stuff like where it's just a pattern like this
post #906649
don't strike me as particularly unusual.

Updated by anonymous

regsmutt said:
Stuff where the wings actually look like they're made out of cosmic material certainly qualify, but stuff like where it's just a pattern like this
post #906649
don't strike me as particularly unusual.

there should probably be a solid tag distinction between cosmic material wings and simply brightly colored wings tbh

Updated by anonymous

facelessmess said:
there should probably be a solid tag distinction between cosmic material wings and simply brightly colored wings tbh

To be fair, if there was, the tag would have like, three images in it, lol. In any case, I do see a use in having cosmic/galaxy pattern tagged, but yeah, it's just not inherently unusual.

Updated by anonymous

From a personal standpoint (ahem, I found the cosmic_wings tag last night, gasped, made the wikipedia for it, and proceeded to add a few more pictures to it--its rather undertagged, but it's a Good Tag.) I don't really care if it's, like SPACE VOID wings or just "star patterned" ... With a still image, it's hard to tell if it's 'cosmic material' or a neat pattern. Also, artist style kinda interferes with that, so I'd be inclined to toss any sort of 'sky wings into it!

That said, cosmic_wings might be better as something else? Celestial_wings? Galaxy_wings? (though that would eliminate wings like post #1000405 )

Anyway!

> Implicating cosmic_wings → unusual_wings

Yas, whatever they are, they are unusual wings.

> mismatched_wings → unusual_wings

not sure on this one. The fact that they're mismatched is unusual, but that doens't mean that each individual wing is unusual. But I mean, yeah, I guess it can't hurt. :)

> unusual_wings → wings

Of course! :D

Updated by anonymous

  • 1