Implicating universal → we're_back!_a_dinosaur's_story_balto_(film)
Link to implication

EDIT: The tag implication jurassic_park -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

EDIT: The tag implication jurassic_world -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

EDIT: The tag implication the_new_woody_woodpecker_show -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

EDIT: The tag implication woody_the_woodpecker_(series) -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1994 (forum #) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

EDIT: The tag implication we're_back!_a_dinosaur's_story -> universal_studios (forum #254124) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

EDIT: The tag implication balto_(film) -> universal_studios (forum #254124) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Shinemon311 said:
Implicating universal → we're_back!_a_dinosaur's_story_balto_(film)
Link to implication

Reason:

Dude.

Okay.

the way these things work is that the thing that is implied comes second.. so:

Shirt implies clothing
Wolf implies canine

So, we're_back!_a_dinosaur's_story should imply universal, not the other way around.

More importantly, you've added balto_(film) to the end of it and that's just wrong... be more careful, please, when you enter these in. :)

Also, if you have a whole bunch of suggestions, it can be faster to make a single implication, then list the others in the reason field :)

Thanks for trying to make e621 a better place!

Flipped all implications and consolidated them here:

Knotty_Curls said:
Flipped all implications and consolidated them here:

• woody_the_woodpecker_(series)
• we're_back!_a_dinosaur's_story
• the_new_woody_woodpecker_show
• jurassic_world
• balto_(film)
• jurassic_park

Unless it's referring to another series entirely, the first Woody Woodpecker series is actually called The Woody Woodpecker Show. Anyway...

• Both Woody Woodpecker copyright tags should be aliased to either woody_woodpecker_(copyright) or woody_woodpecker_(franchise), then implicate one of those to universal.
• Universal was only the distributor of We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story] (which is based on a book) of the same name). I'm not sure if it's worth implicating as a result.
• Balto would be similar to We're Back!, but Universal did produce two direct-to-video sequels, so this one might be OK.
• jurassic_park -> universal is definitely a +1, but not jurassic_world -> universal because the film/sequel franchise is already implicated to jurassic_park; making a separate implication for that one would be redundant.

Its not "universal" its "universal studios".

The tag implication jurassic_park -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

The tag implication jurassic_world -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

The tag implication the_new_woody_woodpecker_show -> universal (forum #254124) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.