I feel that one hyper_breasts tag alone is way too broad, considering the wide variety in sizes of hypers. I suggest this format for naming them, might not be perfect, but I figured I'd at least throw it out there.

Mini_Hypers: Slightly bigger than huge_breasts. For things just above the line that huge_breasts are.

post #595190 post #1179138 post #58793

Medium_Hypers: A little bigger than the previous tag, but too big to actually be practical. Would be greater than a 34S cup in real life, but I'm not sure those terms can apply to furry porn...

post #1295483 post #871348 post #926940

Large_Hypers: Getting to the point where it's novelty oversized beach ball levels. These would quite literally break your back.

post #1295485 post #502324

Massive_Hypers: Breasts that are so massive that they cannot feasably exist anywhere outside of furry porn

post #1295490 post #179787 post #1043455 post #780152 post #1476239 post #1543982

The only problem this organization system might face would be how exactly to determine the size threshold. Considering that tit sag and the shape of breasts can affect their perceived size. I'd say the examples given might be more of a guideline than anything, due to the reasons I mentioned before.

Idk. What do y'all think of this idea?

EDIT: Wrong forum category. Oops

If this system of tagging variations of hyper_breasts is implemented there should probably be other tags for larger breast sizes not covered above in those examples, such as vehicle-sized, building-sized, or planet-sized breasts.

Also, I think head size would be a good reference point for tagging hyper_breasts variations (seeing it's the current reference for tagging big_breasts, huge_breasts, and hyper_breasts). For the examples you gave, I'd say mini_hypers would be about 1.5 times larger than the character's head size, medium_hypers would be 2 times the character's head size, large_hypers would be 3 to 4 times the character's head size, and massive_hypers would be 5 to 6 times the character's head size.

Though I'm unsure how this would work for the larger examples of hyper_breasts I mentioned earlier. Those could probably use cars, houses, and the moon as reference points when tagging (or similar points of reference).

For reference, here is the current breast size chart used in the wiki entries.

Just take out the ambiguous hyper tag and use big/huge/massive/colossal with example images for various body types (including feral / teats). there will never be mathematical tit organization

comparing to the head is a bad idea when the head itself is not proportionate across art styles. i tend to compare to torso / belly button or full height instead

So, before we even open this can of worms and startt trying to restablish a new classification system, who is going to go through the over-9000 hyper_breast posts to classify them?

SnowWolf said:
So, before we even open this can of worms and startt trying to restablish a new classification system, who is going to go through the over-9000 hyper_breast posts to classify them?

I'll do it! For some rubies~

ⁿᵃʰ ʲᵏᶦⁿᵍ

the ones labeled as "mini hyper" are not even hyper tho. the first one is mistagged, and the other two have hyper tagged on it because it has another character with actually hyper breasts.

but anyways... i think that splitting it up in so many different categories is not very good idea, but it would be benefitical to separate
hyper
post #1537912
and asburd hyper
post #1527093

SnowWolf said:
So, before we even open this can of worms and startt trying to restablish a new classification system, who is going to go through the over-9000 hyper_breast posts to classify them?

Fuck, I like hyper breasts. I could retag all the ones I see

D.D.M. said:
If this system of tagging variations of hyper_breasts is implemented there should probably be other tags for larger breast sizes not covered above in those examples, such as vehicle-sized, building-sized, or planet-sized breasts.

Also, I think head size would be a good reference point for tagging hyper_breasts variations (seeing it's the current reference for tagging big_breasts, huge_breasts, and hyper_breasts). For the examples you gave, I'd say mini_hypers would be about 1.5 times larger than the character's head size, medium_hypers would be 2 times the character's head size, large_hypers would be 3 to 4 times the character's head size, and massive_hypers would be 5 to 6 times the character's head size.

Though I'm unsure how this would work for the larger examples of hyper_breasts I mentioned earlier. Those could probably use cars, houses, and the moon as reference points when tagging (or similar points of reference).

For reference, here is the current breast size chart used in the wiki entries.

Breast sizes

__________________________________________________

flat chested

post #249055 post #212780 post #341527

A character with no breasts.

• Do not use this tag for male, maleherm, cuntboy or other manly body types.
• Do not confuse with cuntboy.
• Most cub characters are generally flat-chested, but most loli will have either a flat chest or small breasts.

__________________________________________________

small breasts

post #162139 post #307798 post #76349 post #434015

Not flat chested, but can be from below average size to just developing.

• Most cub characters are generally flat-chested, but most loli will have either a flat chest or small breasts.

__________________________________________________

big breasts

post #494070 post #267786 post #748339

Pretty big, but still smaller than the bearer's head.

__________________________________________________

huge breasts

post #515945 post #284187 post #285976

Still physically plausible to somewhat unlikely. Equal or exceeds the bearer's head in size.

__________________________________________________

hyper breasts

post #539334 post #536890 post #456821

From too large to physically carry and beyond.

__________________________________________________

D.D.M. said:
If this system of tagging variations of hyper_breasts is implemented there should probably be other tags for larger breast sizes not covered above in those examples, such as vehicle-sized, building-sized, or planet-sized breasts.

Also, I think head size would be a good reference point for tagging hyper_breasts variations (seeing it's the current reference for tagging big_breasts, huge_breasts, and hyper_breasts). For the examples you gave, I'd say mini_hypers would be about 1.5 times larger than the character's head size, medium_hypers would be 2 times the character's head size, large_hypers would be 3 to 4 times the character's head size, and massive_hypers would be 5 to 6 times the character's head size.

Though I'm unsure how this would work for the larger examples of hyper_breasts I mentioned earlier. Those could probably use cars, houses, and the moon as reference points when tagging (or similar points of reference).

For reference, here is the current breast size chart used in the wiki entries.

Breast sizes

__________________________________________________

flat chested

post #249055 post #212780 post #341527

A character with no breasts.

• Do not use this tag for male, maleherm, cuntboy or other manly body types.
• Do not confuse with cuntboy.
• Most cub characters are generally flat-chested, but most loli will have either a flat chest or small breasts.

__________________________________________________

small breasts

post #162139 post #307798 post #76349 post #434015

Not flat chested, but can be from below average size to just developing.

• Most cub characters are generally flat-chested, but most loli will have either a flat chest or small breasts.

__________________________________________________

big breasts

post #494070 post #267786 post #748339

Pretty big, but still smaller than the bearer's head.

__________________________________________________

huge breasts

post #515945 post #284187 post #285976

Still physically plausible to somewhat unlikely. Equal or exceeds the bearer's head in size.

__________________________________________________

hyper breasts

post #539334 post #536890 post #456821

From too large to physically carry and beyond.

__________________________________________________

Head size would actually be a pretty good way of determining size. I didn’t think of that.

FibS said:
Just take out the ambiguous hyper tag and use big/huge/massive/colossal with example images for various body types (including feral / teats). there will never be mathematical tit organization

comparing to the head is a bad idea when the head itself is not proportionate across art styles. i tend to compare to torso / belly button or full height instead

FibS said:
Just take out the ambiguous hyper tag and use big/huge/massive/colossal with example images for various body types (including feral / teats). there will never be mathematical tit organization

comparing to the head is a bad idea when the head itself is not proportionate across art styles. i tend to compare to torso / belly button or full height instead

Big and huge are already tags for breast.

Maybe hypers could be a seperate class:

Mini_hyper -> alpha hyper
Medium_hyper -> delta hyper
Large_hyper -> gamma hyper
Massive_hyper -> omega hyper

Idk, I’m bad with tag names

Please no.

The small/big/huge/hyper system is hard enough to use as it is. There's too much overlap and the lines are too fuzzy. I can only see adding more sizes to the system making things even worse.

I can kind of see the justification for distinguishing hyper_foo and absurd_hyper_foo (eg. proportionally building-sized, city-sized, or planet-sized boobs/balls/butt/etc), but wouldn't want to see it go beyond that.

The threshold I would pick would probably be 'body sized' -- ie. if you removed the specified body part, you would be reducing the volume of space occupied by the character's body by >= ~50%, that would be the lower bound of 'absurd'

Of course we would also have to expect that whatever distinction we refine for breasts will be at some point applied to other hyper body parts. Suppose we say absurd_hyper_* is a thing, then that would equate to at least 4 additional tags - absurd_hyper_{breasts,butt,balls,penis}

Maxpizzle said:
Please no.

The small/big/huge/hyper system is hard enough to use as it is. There's too much overlap and the lines are too fuzzy. I can only see adding more sizes to the system making things even worse.

I clearly defined what each one would be in the post. How would it be fuzzy? A little questionable in some cases, yes. But outright fuzzy? No.

Your "mini-hyper" is identical to "huge." With the exception of the girl with the white fur in the third, the all three qualify only as huge, not hyper.

savageorange said:
I can kind of see the justification for distinguishing hyper_foo and absurd_hyper_foo (eg. proportionally building-sized, city-sized, or planet-sized boobs/balls/butt/etc), but wouldn't want to see it go beyond that.

The threshold I would pick would probably be 'body sized' -- ie. if you removed the specified body part, you would be reducing the volume of space occupied by the character's body by >= ~50%, that would be the lower bound of 'absurd'

Of course we would also have to expect that whatever distinction we refine for breasts will be at some point applied to other hyper body parts. Suppose we say absurd_hyper_* is a thing, then that would equate to at least 4 additional tags - absurd_hyper_{breasts,butt,balls,penis}

Things which are clearly at least, what, four times the size of the character's body?

I never said it was perfect. Mini hyper is supposed to be the line between huge and hyper, but thinking about it now, I don’t see that being used often.

Furrin_Gok said:
Things which are clearly at least, what, four times the size of the character's body?

1 time, by my reckoning. I thought "if you removed the specified body part, you would be reducing the volume of space occupied by the character's body by >= ~50%" was actually pretty specific.

post #1295490 and most of the other things in OP's category 'Massive_hypers' would probably qualify.

I think if we set it at 4 times (ie 4/5ths / 80% of total body volume), there actually wouldn't be very many posts that qualify.

savageorange said:
1 time, by my reckoning. I thought "if you removed the specified body part, you would be reducing the volume of space occupied by the character's body by >= ~50%" was actually pretty specific.

post #1295490 and most of the other things in OP's category 'Massive_hypers' would probably qualify.

I think if we set it at 4 times (ie 4/5ths / 80% of total body volume), there actually wouldn't be very many posts that qualify.

I only read the first line V:

There are instances where the size is far greater than the character's body size, 9-puzzle is fond of these sizes.