BlueDingo said:
Try human_on_feral male_on_feral vaginal -pokemon -mlp.

I didn't know you could use negative tags. I didn't find much that I like but that's besides the point, this is clearly it, thank you.

hm what about human on furry/anthro female? By furry/anthro female I mean precissely this kind of style or similar (ignore the massive boobs) http://i.imgur.com/IvR2Zhv.jpg
I've never even seen something like that before and I'm curious now. All sex art I saw with this style is anthro on anthro, like this http://i.imgur.com/qNcSMpG.png

ckgjkjj6 said:
hm what about human on furry/anthro female?

human_on_anthro female -human_focus -animal_penis

Human_focus is still undertagged though, so that results in some mishits.
Might want to throw in -disembodied_penis too, since a lot of users tag those as humans even though they're not supposed to.

Do we have a tag for hats, helmets and hoods that have holes for an animal's ears to poke through or are shaped to contain an animal's ears?

post #55139 post #1146538

BlueDingo said:
Do we have a tag for hats, helmets and hoods that have holes for an animal's ears to poke through or are shaped to contain an animal's ears?

post #55139 post #1146538

Just furgonomics.

Genjar said:
human_on_anthro female -human_focus -animal_penis

Human_focus is still undertagged though, so that results in some mishits.
Might want to throw in -disembodied_penis too, since a lot of users tag those as humans even though they're not supposed to.

Now I know. Humanoid penis it is.

A pair of tags I'd recommend are feral_dom and feral_sub. For images tagged male/male male_on_feral there is no way to separate images such as these:
post #961466 post #591973

Qwaxi~Lixard said:
A pair of tags I'd recommend are feral_dom and feral_sub. For images tagged male/male male_on_feral there is no way to separate images such as these:
post #961466 post #591973

The proper thread for tag suggestions is forum #221775, however you may create a specific thread for this subject if prefer.

Genjar said:
human_on_anthro female -human_focus -animal_penis

Human_focus is still undertagged though, so that results in some mishits.
Might want to throw in -disembodied_penis too, since a lot of users tag those as humans even though they're not supposed to.

Thank you.

Currently, cellphone refers to any handheld phone. Since smartphone is aliased to that, how do we differentiate smartphones from older style phones (besides iphone which only refers to Apple's phones)?

post #91835 <- smartphone / not smartphone -> post #65159post #252902

What is the correct tag for being blinded on one eye? I thought about one_eyed but what if the character have several eyes?

Sorrowless said:
What is the correct tag for being blinded on one eye? I thought about one_eyed but what if the character have several eyes?

blind_eye. Often accompanied by eye_scar.

Genjar said:
human_on_anthro female -human_focus -animal_penis

Human_focus is still undertagged though, so that results in some mishits.
Might want to throw in -disembodied_penis too, since a lot of users tag those as humans even though they're not supposed to.

What if we can't see that the penis is disembodied?

BlueDingo said:
Currently, cellphone refers to any handheld phone. Since smartphone is aliased to that, how do we differentiate smartphones from older style phones (besides iphone which only refers to Apple's phones)?

post #91835 <- smartphone / not smartphone -> post #65159post #252902

I suggest using "analog_cellphone" or something alike. This way, to search for "cellphone - analog_cellphone" would (theorically) result in posts showing smartphones, this isn't a perfect system, though.

O16 said:
I suggest using "analog_cellphone" or something alike. This way, to search for "cellphone - analog_cellphone" would (theorically) result in posts showing smartphones, this isn't a perfect system, though.

Aren't all cellphones digital? Even this thing is digital.

The only phones I can think of that could be considered analogue are rotary phones.

BlueDingo said:
Aren't all cellphones digital? Even this thing is digital.

The only phones I can think of that could be considered analogue are rotary phones.

Analogue has two meanings, you may want to look it up so you can make sense of O16's statement. I, on the other hand, am busy and sincerely at a loss of words for describing. I don't know what they mean either, but it sounds like the other meaning.

O16 said:
I suggest using "analog_cellphone" or something alike.

Analog phones are these things here:
post #679794 post #92255
Preferably with a girl operator on the other end, because the stepper thingy they used is arguably a kind of proto-digital tech. Everything past that era is digital.

Cellphones that aren't smartphones are sometimes called "dumbphones". Alternatively, maybe tag smartphones as such and use cellphone for anything that's cellular but not a smart-phone.

I've seen many images with the same style as this one.

post #1006456

Is this a parody of something?

BlueDingo said:
Is this a parody of something?

Obama's campaign image, yes. Google obamicon.

BlueDingo said:
I've seen many images with the same style as this one.

post #1006456

Is this a parody of something?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_"Hope"_poster

Sorrowless said:
What if we can't see that the penis is disembodied?

Do you know what "Disembodied" means here? It means we can't see a body it's attached to. A little bit of a mound does not count as a body, either.

If it's visibly separated from the body, that's detachable_penis.

Thoughts on tags for differentiating between characters that have had their skin removed, vs a species that just happens to have exposed muscle tissue in its otherwise normal state?

post #945537 post #455591 -vs- post #539884 post #283042

I'm bringing this up mainly because one is commonly associated with gore, whereas the other is a more general-audience theme in games/anime. The above posts contain all three rating levels.

We have both skinned and skinless, but they're kind of randomly applied at the moment.

Is their a tag for peeps getting felt up?
I know that's a bit of a strange question to ask outta the blue
but I'm looking for refs for a doodle I'm doodling ╹‿╹)

Notkastar said:
Is their a tag for peeps getting felt up?

Depends on what you mean by "felt up". Maybe grope?

BlueDingo said:
Depends on what you mean by "felt up". Maybe grope?

Close enough, Thanks for the help dood! ◠‿◠)

And Felt up, Groped- I mean pretty much the same thing.
I just needed help nailing down what reaction and body
language someone on the receiving end would have when being surprised groped
("Grammar" what's anime is that? T‿T)
By their significant other. Wasn't sure whether their arms would be up sorta like a cats or more back because they are being surprised after all lolz ╹‿╹)

Do we have a tag for a character spinning their tail(s) around like helicopter blades? I tried searching for things like tail_spin and helicopter_tail but nothing matching this came up.

post #70416post #295846

Ijerk said:
We have both skinned and skinless, but they're kind of randomly applied at the moment.

I suspect that's unlikely to change no matter what choice of tags you make personally.

BlueDingo said:
Do we have a tag for a character spinning their tail(s) around like helicopter blades? I tried searching for things like tail_spin and helicopter_tail but nothing matching this came up.

post #70416post #295846

there's helicopter_motion, and that seems to be it. I'd fully support helicopter_tail.

TheGreatWolfgang said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_"Hope"_poster

The funny part is that the tag already exists, but it was only used on a deleted post XD

Is there a tag for unnatural fur/hair colors (pink mammals etc)?

cfgv said:
Is there a tag for unnatural fur/hair colors (pink mammals etc)?

alternate_color, but I don't know if it applies to everything unnaturally colored.

cfgv said:
Is there a tag for unnatural fur/hair colors (pink mammals etc)?

Just *color*_fur and et cetera. We have Alternate_color for Pokemon and Digimon (the common examples), but in a fandom full of OC DONUT STEELs and rainbow-sparkle-winged-*species*, "unnatural_color" would lose its meaning and be relatively useless.

Is there a tag for when a character's heart protrudes from their chest?

post #849381 post #1149435

BlueDingo said:
Is there a tag for when a character's heart protrudes from their chest?

post #849381 post #1149435

doesn't look like it. Feel free to create one.

Circeus said:
doesn't look like it. Feel free to create one.

Alright. I chose protruding_heart.

Is there a main tag for clothing with two rows of buttons?

post #620110

So far, there's 2 tagged double-breasted and 1 tagged double_breasted_suit. Wikipedia refers to this as Double-breasted.

Mastery_Position is for when the person being penetrated is on top. What if the person being penetrated is on bottom, or it's hard to tell?
post #1166589

I've encountered a similar issue. Is there a name for the position where both are lying and the one on top is facing away?

Sorrowless said:
I've encountered a similar issue. Is there a name for the position where both are lying and the one on top is facing away?

Wait what? How does that even WORK.

Furrin_Gok said:
Mastery_Position is for when the person being penetrated is on top. What if the person being penetrated is on bottom, or it's hard to tell?
post #1166589

I would suggest reverse_mastery_position but that's aliased away. The example you've got is pretty close to missionary, though. It's only mastery-like because of the out-of-proportions abdomen.

Circeus said:
I would suggest reverse_mastery_position but that's aliased away. The example you've got is pretty close to missionary, though. It's only mastery-like because of the out-of-proportions abdomen.

That's what I thought when I first looked at it, smaller_male missionary_position but reclining instead of lying.

Sorrowless said:
I've encountered a similar issue. Is there a name for the position where both are lying and the one on top is facing away?

You mean like this?

post #1136850

BlueDingo said:
That's what I thought when I first looked at it, smaller_male missionary_position but reclining instead of lying.

You mean like this?

post #1136850

If that's the case, this is ass_to_ass (though that tag could use a cleanup to remove some stuff that ought to be hip_bump).

Like this post #1021042

I should have mentioned both are on their backs.
The comments deal with this subject as well.

Circeus said:
[…] (though that tag could use a cleanup to remove some stuff that ought to be hip_bump).

The ass_to_ass wiki says "any position in which two characters are touching butts" consequently "hip_bump" would be more like a subcategory of it.

Sorrowless said:
Like this post #1021042

I should have mentioned both are on their backs.
The comments deal with this subject as well.

Sincerely, I don't know. Usually I just take a look on the wiki when need to tag a sexual position (I can't memorize the names properly).

post #910355
Looked up this hair style. As far as I know it's called a side flip. Is there a tag for this?

We have dual_wielding when a character is wielding two weapons. What if they're wielding three, four or more?

post #953196

pixelPile said:
post #910355
Looked up this hair style. As far as I know it's called a side flip. Is there a tag for this?

You really don't need to ask when something has a clear, single name. It just happen to be completely untagged (TBH I don't see why most people would bother, but hey it's not the sort of stuff I upload anyway). The thread is more for things that have no obvious name, or are likely to have many names. For simple stuff, go with the actual name. Unless you expect to tag hundreds of them, you can always edit it later if you find out a well-used tag already existed.

Sorrowless said:
Like this post #1021042

I should have mentioned both are on their backs.
The comments deal with this subject as well.

By out naming convention, this is probably reverse_speed_bump_position.

BlueDingo said:
We have dual_wielding when a character is wielding two weapons. What if they're wielding three, four or more?

post #953196

Multi_wielding would follow the standard tagging conventions. Doesn't exist yet, though.

Sorrowless said:
Like this post #1021042

I should have mentioned both are on their backs.
The comments deal with this subject as well.

That's commonly known as the pearly gates position, which we don't have a tag for yet.

Circeus said:
You really don't need to ask when something has a clear, single name. It just happen to be completely untagged (TBH I don't see why most people would bother, but hey it's not the sort of stuff I upload anyway). The thread is more for things that have no obvious name, or are likely to have many names. For simple stuff, go with the actual name. Unless you expect to tag hundreds of them, you can always edit it later if you find out a well-used tag already existed.

By out naming convention, this is probably reverse_speed_bump_position.

I just looked it up so I wouldn't know if it falls into the simple or non-obvious category.
Can anyone just add tags with no regulation? I thought it was against the rules or would be to let anyone start making up tags and using them.
I wouldn't be tagging hundreds but maybe 60 depending on what I find in my favorites.

pixelPile said:
Can anyone just add tags with no regulation?

No, like it says in the rules. At least mention it somewhere first, before making up new general tags.

It's only mentioned is in the commenting rules section though, so it gets often overlooked.

Genjar said:
Multi_wielding would follow the standard tagging conventions. Doesn't exist yet, though.

Then let's make it exist.

Is there a tag for sharp fingernails / claws being involved with fingering?

Because seriously, seeing that makes my nonexistent vagina squirm in agony, and my existing anus clench in fear.

Clawdragons said:
Is there a tag for sharp fingernails / claws being involved with fingering?

Because seriously, seeing that makes my nonexistent vagina squirm in agony, and my existing anus clench in fear.

I'm pretty sure that's still just fingering. Maybe search "fingering sharp_claws"?

At least getting fingered with sharp claws wouldn't be as bad as getting a blowjob from Mileena.

----------------

Do we have a tag for when a cloud clearly forms the shape of something?

post #1215152

There's probably several images of Mufasa like this.

BlueDingo said:
I'm pretty sure that's still just fingering. Maybe search "fingering sharp_claws"?

That doesn't really do that good of a job of finding (or avoiding) such images. Too high of a false-positive rate, particularly because the sharp claws need not be on the hand.

Maybe I'll create a public set of such images. Then if we ever do decide it's worth having a tag for, it'll be easy to tag too.

I think fingering with claws is pretty hot so a tag as an eventuality sounds good to me.

Previous questions from other threads. Is there a tag for:

• When a character has an object (usually a pencil) on their ear?
• Double-ended weapons?
• When a character is building something?
• When one character hits another character so hard that they send the other character flying?
• When a character holds an article of clothing against their body to see what it would look like if they were wearing it?

post #1071383post #1097342post #933081
post #90943post #323626

Edit 03/04/17: Fuck it, going with "object_on_ear" for the first one.

Is there a tag for when an anus is stretched outwards during penetration?

Like in these images:
post #851017 post #206773 post #1006355

Why is there a special tag for a maleherm but none to specify a "femaleherm"
Even though a herm is implied as a female at least in-part, would help with specificity in searching.
Separate tags for male or female hermaphrodites.
I'm not very familiar with common tagging conventions, so please go easy if it seems obvious to you.

FluffyBird said:
Why is there a special tag for a maleherm but none to specify a "femaleherm"

~600 maleherm vs. ~8000 herm -maleherm. A "femaleherm" tag would apply to ~92.5% of herm images.

BlueDingo said:
~600 maleherm vs. ~8000 herm -maleherm. A "femaleherm" tag would apply to ~92.5% of herm images.

Still, if tags like presenting have subcategories such as presenting_pussy and presenting_penis why not the same for herms?
Also, nobody seems to like using the presenting_penis tag, even though it already exists.
Might be worth adding the tag string "solo male presenting" as implied presenting_penis
Just seems odd to me to unnecessarily over-complicate search-strings when easy simplifications could be made.

Protip: Try to use wiki links (ie. \presenting -> presenting) for singular tags and search links (ie. \solo male presenting -> solo male presenting) for multiple tags.

FluffyBird said:
Still, if tags like presenting have subcategories such as presenting_pussy and presenting_penis why not the same for herms?
Also, nobody seems to like using the presenting_penis tag, even though it already exists.
Might be worth adding the tag string "solo male presenting" as implied presenting_penis
Just seems odd to me to unnecessarily over-complicate search-strings when easy simplifications could be made.

solo male presenting will result in many presenting_hindquarters images as well. Chances are the presenting_penis tag is undertagged because people don't know what exactly counts as presenting it (or they can't be bothered, that's also possible). Some cases are very obvious, others are not. presenting_hindquarters, on the other hand, is much easier to spot.

anew742 said:
Is there a tag for when an anus is stretched outwards during penetration?

Like in these images:
post #851017 post #206773 post #1006355

"Anal_tugging".

FluffyBird said:
Why is there a special tag for a maleherm but none to specify a "femaleherm"
Even though a herm is implied as a female at least in-part, would help with specificity in searching.
Separate tags for male or female hermaphrodites.
I'm not very familiar with common tagging conventions, so please go easy if it seems obvious to you.

See forum #224095, it probably is in your interest.

BlueDingo said:
~600 maleherm vs. ~8000 herm -maleherm. A "femaleherm" tag would apply to ~92.5% of herm images.

That, or maleherm isn't being tagged. We should have a femherm tag, just so that people can actually have a working search/blacklist.

Should hands_free be a tag? I was looking through the comments of this post when I got the idea.
post #569029

Sorrowless said:
Should hands_free be a tag? I was looking through the comments of this post when I got the idea.
post #569029

But, it already is.

O16 said:
But, it already is.

Eh? You mean dildo sitting? Are there no other way to go hands free? What if the dildo is stuck to the wall or something. Or someone is intentionally orgasming from no direct stimulation.

Sorrowless said:
Eh? You mean dildo sitting? […]

Wiki.

It it is exclusively used to males, herms and dickgirls, for some reason.

O16 said:
Wiki

It is exclusively used to males, herms and dickgirls, for some reason.

Ah. I didn't search with a -. Perhaps we should include females to this tag?

Sorrowless said:
Ah. I didn't search with a -. Perhaps we should include females to this tag?

I) Hands_free is aliased to it, hence the hyphen isn't necessary.

II) Maybe we should create a female/herm/cuntboy specific version (somewhat similar to `titfuck` and `pecjob`).

O16 said:
Wiki.

It it is exclusively used to males, herms and dickgirls, for some reason.

Females don't have penises.

BlueDingo said:
Females don't have penises.

_{^{No, hyenas don't count.[/spoiler][/sub]}}

That word doesn't imply a dick to me.

BlueDingo said:
Females don't have penises.

I just meant that hands-free is only used to orgasms of characters with a penis, but the reason for that isn't apparent to me.

BlueDingo said:
_{^{No, hyenas don't count.[/spoiler][/sub]}}

Actually they count; an overdeveloped clitoris isn't a penis.

Sorrowless said:
That word doesn't imply a dick to me.

That is the point.

O16 said:
I just meant that hands-free is only used to orgasms of characters with a penis, but the reason for that isn't apparent to me.

hands-free is currently defined as "A character ejaculating without direct stimulation of the penis". Ejaculating only applies to external cumshots, which require a penis to perform. Hands-free's full name is "hands-free ejaculation".

O16 said:
Actually they count; an overdeveloped clitoris isn't a penis.

What I meant was a female hyena with a pseudo-penis doesn't count as a female with a penis.

BlueDingo said:
hands-free is currently defined as "A character ejaculating without direct stimulation of the penis". Ejaculating only applies to external cumshots, which require a penis to perform. Hands-free's full name is "hands-free ejaculation".

But `pussy_ejaculation` is a thing.

BlueDingo said:
What I meant was a female hyena with a pseudo-penis doesn't count as a female with a penis.

Oops. I thought that "No, hyenas don't count" meant that hyenas were an exception; I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

BlueDingo said:
Ejaculating only applies to external cumshots, which require a penis to perform. Hands-free's full name is "hands-free ejaculation".

Both external and internal.
It's an umbrella tag, and was specifically created because users kept mistagging internal ejaculation as cumshot.

Come to think about it, I should get around to cleaning internal ejaculation cumshot someday. Most of those shouldn't have the cumshot tag.

O16 said:
That is the point.

What is the origin for this term? It's not like hands free when we speak of riding bikes only applies to males.

Sorrowless said:
What is the origin for this term? It's not like hands free when we speak of riding bikes only applies to males.

BlueDingo said a few posts ago:
Hands-free's full name is "hands-free ejaculation".

Genjar said:
Come to think about it, I should get around to cleaning internal ejaculation cumshot someday. Most of those shouldn't have the cumshot tag.

Cleaning up cumshots... Sounds messy.

If two characters assume a sexual position but don't have sex, what would you tag that as?

You can't tag the position because they all imply sex, which isn't happening in this case, and would result in a mistag.

BlueDingo said:
If two characters assume a sexual position but don't have sex, what would you tag that as?

You can't tag the position because they all imply sex, which isn't happening in this case, and would result in a mistag.

What kind of position? Missionary without sex would be on_top + laying, chair position would be just on_lap, etc.