Victoria_Oblong said:
Living_latex has only 14 uses and no wiki page either, plus all the uses for it appear to be for the liquid-latex-goo-transformation case.

living latex get undertaged because it often is synonymous to goo_creature(ex. 1-3) or slime(ex. 4-6) from a visual standpoint in art here.

Kogith said:
post #60830
cum spurting from offscreen? disembodied_cum??

cum_from_viewer(as opposed to cum_on_viewer ) and/or cum_from_offscreen would be more apt, disembodied_* only applies to bodyparts (so far) not fluids and applying disembodied to fluids would pose the problem of applying to nearly every single post with cum because any spatter regardless if from the character or offscreen is technically disembodied from the rest of the fluid connected to the penis...

BlueDingo said:
A tag for when characters have their normal, canon proportions?

It doesn't exist, and I don't see how it could. There's too many art styles, and the canon is rarely uniform either.

For instance, look at this Fox McCloud from the comic.

Also, except for the penis, how does post #787950 differ from the canon?

Ruku said:
living latex get undertaged because it often is synonymous to goo_creature(ex. 1-3) or slime(ex. 4-6) from a visual standpoint in art here.

Which is why it shouldn't be used a lot (if at all). If it's impossible to tell by twys that it's specifically latex, it should just be tagged under the goo_* tag group.

We did the same with the creation of the metallic_body tag: it's impossible to determine the exact metal, so specific tags such as iron_* and steel_* should not be used.

Genjar said:
Which is why it shouldn't be used a lot (if at all). If it's impossible to tell by twys that it's specifically latex, it should just be tagged under the goo_* tag group.

We did the same with the creation of the metallic_body tag: it's impossible to determine the exact metal, so specific tags such as iron_* and steel_* should not be used.

I believe living_latex is distinguished by its association with latex_suit and living_clothes. If a latex_suit is alive, should it be tagged as a goo_creature?

A tag for when a character's mouth is sewn shut?

post #810570

BlueDingo said:
A tag for when a character's mouth is sewn shut?

post #810570

We have 'stitched_mouth'.

-/-/-/-

Do we have a tag for sexsomnia (sexual sonmambulism)?
If not, should we have one?

e.g. post #1195485

O16 said:

We have 'stitched_mouth'.

-/-/-/-

Do we have a tag for sexsomnia (sexual sonmambulism)?
If not, should we have one?

e.g. post #1195485

sleep sex sounds close, but your thumbnail shows otherwise. Perhaps the tag could be broadened, or something like sleep_penetrating, to describe the person, whom is asleep, doing an action. I can imagine this occurring for fingering, and sleep_fingering came to mind.

Siral_Exan said:
sleep sex sounds close, but your thumbnail shows otherwise. Perhaps the tag could be broadened, or something like sleep_penetrating, to describe the person, whom is asleep, doing an action. I can imagine this occurring for fingering, and sleep_fingering came to mind.

I agree about boarding the tag, but prefer another name. Sexsomnia does not means the unconscious character is penetrating, just means it is actively participating (being penetrated also is included).

What about 'sexual_somnambulism'_empty? it is less technical than 'sexsomnia' and preserve the full meaning.

Explicative note: unlike some may think, sleepwalking isn't the same as somnambulism, but a subtype of it. The term 'Somnambulism' encompasses various abnormal motor activities during sleep, being one of the most common types of parasomnia (sleep disorders).

post #805195

what is a tortavi? from what i can tell, it only seems to be tagged on pics with this ket_ralus) character. who, as far as i can tell, is a turtle.

treos said:
post #805195

what is a tortavi? from what i can tell, it only seems to be tagged on pics with this ket_ralus) character. who, as far as i can tell, is a turtle.

According to his website, the tortavi are a fictional species of warm bloodied, mammalian-like turtle that he has as his fursona, hence why all content of him is tagged as such.

Our policy is to Tag What You See so if you want to just tag it as a turtle you can.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Do we have a tag for when a character's hair and fur seem interconnected? As in: the hair is very obviously not a fur tuft, heavily hair-looking, but is still connected to fur or looks as such either by sharing the same colors and/or being attached to fur? This is hard to describe, but I think the first 3 examples are probably the best for what i'm trying to explain.

I guess that (besides 'mane_hair') 'hair_tuft' also could be useful regarding this subject matter.

p.s. Sorry for the dely.

The ruler markings often seen on police mugshots?

post #1182574

BlueDingo said:
The ruler markings often seen on police mugshots?

post #1182574

Mugshot kind of implies that, but it does seem messy. Just cleaned out some regular headshot_portraits from there.

Maybe height_chart would suffice?

Genjar said:
Mugshot kind of implies that, but it does seem messy. Just cleaned out some regular headshot_portraits from there.

Maybe height_chart would suffice?

+1 for height chart.

Is there a modifier or a different tag when a character is in the "All Fours" position but does not actually have all four limbs on the ground?

Like here or here

Question about underwear vs. outerwear, motivated by this particular question "What is Krystal wearing???"

post #1282479

My first thought is bra + loincloth, but bra implies underwear whereas in the case of Krystal and many similar "tribal" or fantasy characters like her, the top is her normal outfit not worn under anything.

post #1176751

I wouldn't call it a bikini, nor is it armored so bikini_armor is out. So I guess what I'm looking for is a tag for "bra-like outerwear". tribal_clothing is the only thing I can think of.

Do we have a tag for a sex position similar to the table lotus position, but with the receiving partner lying on front instead of on back?

e.g. post #1294337

O16 said:
Do we have a tag for a sex position similar to the table lotus position, but with the receiving partner lying on front instead of on back?

e.g. post #1294337

We only have the generic from_behind_position for that.
It's rare enough that there's no well-established name for it, but I've seen it called the 'couch surfer' position.

Do we have a tag for strips of cloth (or other material, cloth is the most common) that're wrapped around the limbs/body to act as clothing. Wrappings came to mind immediately and is used in such fashion, but I also know it as bindings and, in a looser term, bandages (obviously they're not used as intended).

Is there a term for when a glowing object moves fast enough to leave a streak of light behind it?

post #1300872 <- His eyes. You can't see it in the thumbnail.

Siral_Exan said:
Do we have a tag for strips of cloth (or other material, cloth is the most common) that're wrapped around the limbs/body to act as clothing. Wrappings came to mind immediately and is used in such fashion, but I also know it as bindings and, in a looser term, bandages (obviously they're not used as intended).

Usually the tag for that is just X-body-part + wraps. For instance arm_wraps, leg_wraps, chest_wraps, etc.

Dyrone said:
Usually the tag for that is just X-body-part + wraps. For instance arm_wraps, leg_wraps, chest_wraps, etc.

Thank you. This honestly kept me confused for a while, until I dropped it.

BlueDingo said:
Is there a term for when a glowing object moves fast enough to leave a streak of light behind it?

post #1300872 <- His eyes. You can't see it in the thumbnail.

Reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-exposure_photography

thru considering exposure tends to stand for a uncovered part of a body on e621 the technical name for the feature is not viable.
--
https://www.google.com/search?q=timelapse&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6isn0zd_VAhXJllQKHWuQBTcQ_AUIDCgD&biw=1535&bih=765&dpr=1.25

There is also time_lapse which does seem fairly consistent in google searches but apparently isnt used for the same propose on e621....

BlueDingo said:
Is there a term for when a glowing object moves fast enough to leave a streak of light behind it?

post #1300872 <- His eyes. You can't see it in the thumbnail.

I don't think there is one, so I suggest light_streak or *color*_streak, in your case purple_streak (although it may get mixed up with colored streaks of hair).

Siral_Exan said:
I don't think there is one, so I suggest light_streak or *color*_streak, in your case purple_streak (although it may get mixed up with colored streaks of hair).

I'd say light_streak or light_trail would work well enough. There's no real need to go point out what colour it is.

Is here a tag for characters applying makeup, facepaint, etc?

post #919598post #1286837

Also, do we differentiate between lipstick and the "stick" its contained in?

--------------

A term for pants with detachable sleeves?

post #1276448

BlueDingo said:
Is here a tag for characters applying makeup, facepaint, etc?

post #919598post #1286837

Apparently we haven't, but there is a word for that 'making-up', it is a bit polysemic, though.

BlueDingo said:
Also, do we differentiate between lipstick and the "stick" its contained in?

I guess the object lipstick encompasses both content and container.

BlueDingo said:
A term for pants with detachable sleeves?

post #1276448

No idea.

O16 said:
Apparently we haven't, but there is a word for that 'making-up', it is a bit polysemic, though.

Nah, that's too easy to misinterpret. We could use applying_makeup but that wouldn't include face paint, war paint, etc.

Is there a tag for voyeurism?

owoqueoriginal said:
Is there a tag for voyeurism?

voyeur.

Siral_Exan said:
voyeur.

thank you

i feel dumb for asking >_<

Do we have a tag for "emphasis" effects?

e.g. post #1312688

O16 said:
Do we have a tag for "emphasis" effects?

e.g. post #1312688

sound_effects / onomatopoeia ?

closest we have that fits the what the white in the middle seems to be, as far as i know...

to note, sound effects are not always implied by text.

PS: Find it rather interesting e621 doesnt appear to have a tag for fake guns that fire flags with "BANG!" written on them by the way...

O16 said:
Do we have a tag for "emphasis" effects?

e.g. post #1312688

There are some zoom_lines around the edge. Not sure what to call the white bit in the middle, though.

That other thread reminded me - do we have a tag for animals that are basically background props? Such as random fish in underwater scenes, or a barely visible bird in the sky?

post #1302418 post #1228968 post #1312679

If not, then how about tagging those as wildlife? Arguably that might end up used for feral characters, but that seems unlikely. Since it hasn't been tagged at all, so far.

Genjar said:
That other thread reminded me - do we have a tag for animals that are basically background props? Such as random fish in underwater scenes, or a barely visible bird in the sky?

post #1302418 post #1228968 post #1312679

If not, then how about tagging those as wildlife? Arguably that might end up used for feral characters, but that seems unlikely. Since it hasn't been tagged at all, so far.

If they ever get around to the character-based tagging system, we can add a tag for that, but I think that for the moment we shouldn't really tag it. It still nees to be tagged as bird or fish, and your second image shows that avian wildlife can have both background and major characters that follow the avian tag.

Genjar said:
That other thread reminded me - do we have a tag for animals that are basically background props? Such as random fish in underwater scenes, or a barely visible bird in the sky?

post #1302418 post #1228968 post #1312679

If not, then how about tagging those as wildlife? Arguably that might end up used for feral characters, but that seems unlikely. Since it hasn't been tagged at all, so far.

I believe we should have a tag for background characters in general, not only for wildlife; additionally this tag name wouldn't work well, since urban animals (not counting human) may be background elements too.

Is there a tag for hugely gaping holes ?
From what I've seen, there's only a gaping tag that covers small and almost inexistant gaps up to hyper gaps.

For example, both of these share the same tag :
post #1302193 post #1311261

Do we have a tag for... this:
post #1315038
There's a penis inside a fleshlight inside an anus. Kinda similar to how living_condom works, but with penetrable toys instead of other characters.

Salok said:
Is there a tag for hugely gaping holes ?
From what I've seen, there's only a gaping tag that covers small and almost inexistant gaps up to hyper gaps.

For example, both of these share the same tag :
post #1302193 post #1311261

not specificly but you can try "hyper_anus + gaping" or "gaping_anus + hyper"

Calimero000 said:
Do we have a tag for... this:
post #1315038
There's a penis inside a fleshlight inside an anus. Kinda similar to how living_condom works, but with penetrable toys instead of other characters.

penetrable_sex_toy + anal_penetration ...

Darou said:
penetrable_sex_toy + anal_penetration ...

Yes, but that includes mostly posts where the penetrable_sex_toy is not inside a character.

Hey friends, I was wondering if we have a tag for when a female character is resting both of her arms under her breasts and has her hands holding, resting between her legs(like in a pinup fashion)? Heres a example of what i'm trying describe:

post #1249757

sorry for poorly describing this, hope you understand the question and can tell me the appropriate tag (if one even exists for it). Thanks for your time :)

Genjar said:
That other thread reminded me - do we have a tag for animals that are basically background props? Such as random fish in underwater scenes, or a barely visible bird in the sky?

post #1302418 post #1228968 post #1312679

If not, then how about tagging those as wildlife? Arguably that might end up used for feral characters, but that seems unlikely. Since it hasn't been tagged at all, so far.

Maybe instead of wildlife phrase it as environmental_fauna? I'm not sure I'd really classify the fish in third picture that way since they're fairly distinct and detailed. It happens a lot to arthropods too.

post #1077968

There's some grey area, though. I personally would define it as an animal drawn indistinctly that the characters are not interacting with. Stuff that when you see the species tag for it, it's not obvious what that tag is even referring to at a first glance.

This is almost a guaranteed no, but I'll ask anyway. Is there a tag for when every character involved is genderswapped?

I've seen many images where the camera is looking at one character from between the legs of another. Does this view have a name?

Is there any reliable way to find Pokémon images that don't contain any pokémon? (More examples) You can't exclude or blacklist all 800+ pokémon, attempting the latter just leads to hundreds of empty pages and only excluding/blacklisting the 5 most common terms has hardly any effect.

Digimon has the exact same problem.

post #305637post #1322654post #7081post #96779

What are the things on this guy's feet called?

post #284775

BlueDingo said:
What are the things on this guy's feet called?

post #284775

Toeless_shoes, maybe?

Does pole_dancing count towards holding_object?

It shouldn't be implicated in this case, but I'm wondering if it would be useful to have a separate general tag that covers objects that are part of a structure, like a handrail or ladder.

Ijerk said:
Does pole_dancing count towards holding_object?

It shouldn't be implicated in this case, but I'm wondering if it would be useful to have a separate general tag that covers objects that are part of a structure, like a handrail or ladder.

You know what? I've never thought about applying holding_object to fixed objects before. After all, just about every image of a character pole dancing, driving, etc. contains a character holding such an object.

Ijerk said:
Does pole_dancing count towards holding_object?

It shouldn't be implicated in this case, but I'm wondering if it would be useful to have a separate general tag that covers objects that are part of a structure, like a handrail or ladder.

What you're describing is more in line with leaning and arm_support.

regsmutt said:
What you're describing is more in line with leaning and arm_support.

Not really.

post #710851post #1210281post #1211200

All involve holding something, all don't require leaning.

Do we have a tag for when a character is building something?

post #1356143post #933081

HauntedTraveler said:
Hey friends, I was wondering if we have a tag for when a female character is resting both of her arms under her breasts and has her hands holding, resting between her legs(like in a pinup fashion)? Heres a example of what i'm trying describe:

post #1249757

sorry for poorly describing this, hope you understand the question and can tell me the appropriate tag (if one even exists for it). Thanks for your time :)

I want to say the tag for that is holding_breast.

Do we have a tag for the point of view of looking up at a character? Like this:
post #1355298

SharkFetish said:
Do we have a tag for the point of view of looking up at a character? Like this:
post #1355298

low-angle_view

BlueDingo said:
Do we have a tag for when a character is building something?

construction_worker seems relevant to the first one, but not the second.

carpenter would apply to both images, but has no wiki page and only 5 hits.

construction also has no wiki page, but isn't too specific, and is already on 38 images.

I can't think of an official tag for this.

Do we have a tag for when there's a foreground thing, and then a sketch version of that thing in the background? Or maybe not a sketch, but a different style?
post #1356030

MatrixMash said:
Do we have a tag for when there's a foreground thing, and then a sketch version of that thing in the background? Or maybe not a sketch, but a different style?
post #1356030

your example image is not at all what you are describing because its exact same thing, just lowered opacity.

Ledian said:
your example image is not at all what you are describing because its exact same thing, just lowered opacity.

Sorry. Ignore what I said; what is the name for what's going on in that image? I've seen it a couple of times and would like to put a name to it.

edit: to clarify, I am asking specifically about the artistic device of taking the foreground image, reducing the opacity or whatever, and placing it in the background.

MatrixMash said:
Do we have a tag for when there's a foreground thing, and then a sketch version of that thing in the background? Or maybe not a sketch, but a different style?
post #1356030

zoom_layer, blowup_background

BlueDingo said:
What are the things on this guy's feet called?

post #284775

Genjar said:
Toeless_shoes, maybe?

Those look like spats, except (unless you're Scrooge McDuck) you'd wear them over something else if you have plantigrade feet. Seems fine as single footwear for digitigrades though, cause honestly, what else are you going to wear?

Outside of fictional digitgrade-type shoes o/c.

This guy's hat has earrings attached to it. Is there a tag for that?

post #1174421

Cala Maria has an "evil form" that she transforms into during phase two of the fight...pictured here on the left:

post #1351725

What is a good tag for this? I know about dual_persona, but there are many images where this form is featured solo, so that tag wouldn't work all the time (example: post #1356549)

Dyrone said:
Cala Maria has an "evil form" that she transforms into during phase two of the fight...pictured here on the left:

Sounds similar to pinkamena_(mlp), so based on past decisions, that form should have its own character tag.

Genjar said:
Sounds similar to pinkamena_(mlp), so based on past decisions, that form should have its own character tag.

I mean, probably, but I'm more interested in a tag that denotes alternate forms in general, if such a tag exists.

Dyrone said:
I mean, probably, but I'm more interested in a tag that denotes alternate forms in general, if such a tag exists.

Alternate form and square crossover for when both are in the same image. Having a tag for Medusa Cala Marina would be good though, so we can specifically search for square crossovers of her.

SharkFetish said:
I want to say the tag for that is holding_breast.

Thanks for helping me friend

How about post #1362163? I know there's some sort of sexual act going on here, but I can't think of what it might be called. Any ideas?

post #1362163

http://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2557089

Is there a tag for the way she is lifting up her ass? I know it's not from this website, but I figure it can apply here as well.

UnusualParadox said:
How about post #1362163? I know there's some sort of sexual act going on here, but I can't think of what it might be called. Any ideas?

post #1362163

immanent_tentacle_rape is my best guess.

Dyrone said:
http://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2557089

Is there a tag for the way she is lifting up her ass? I know it's not from this website, but I figure it can apply here as well.

holding_butt?

What I want to know is if there's a tag for the range of typical "autofellatio positions" for anthro/humanoid males, where he's upside_down, neck or shoulders on the ground, ass in the air. It's basically what the bottom does for the piledriver_position. I'd call it solo_piledriver. Most unexpectedly, the basic idea of the piledriver position (i.e., penis penetrating straight down) is maintained even in such a solo arrangement.

Two-for-one example:

post #1260794

abadbird said:
What I want to know is if there's a tag for the range of typical "autofellatio positions" for anthro/humanoid males, where he's upside_down, neck or shoulders on the ground, ass in the air.

shoulder_stand

Damn. That is why I asked. Did not come up in the normal searches, so I added a note for it in piledriver_position and upside_down. It could probably cleanly implicate upside_down.