Aliasing living_latex → liquid_latex
Link to alias

Reason:

it is the same thing so we have less different tags on this side

EDIT: The tag alias living_latex -> liquid_latex (forum #256006) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

I'd say reverse it, I'd prefer living rather than liquid.

Furrin_Gok said:
I'd say reverse it, I'd prefer living rather than liquid.

or like that it just seems liquid is the bigger tag so I went to that

Also isn't liquid latex when a character has liquid latex poured over them to turn them into a living latex thing, when living latex is specifically a character made of latex? You could have a series of images, then, where in the earlier ones it's only liquid, not living.

-1 ^^

living_latex does sound like it should be a species tag, in same vein as animate_inanimate. Whereas liquid_latex is just... liquid latex?

Furrin_Gok said:
Also isn't liquid latex when a character has liquid latex poured over them to turn them into a living latex thing, when living latex is specifically a character made of latex? You could have a series of images, then, where in the earlier ones it's only liquid, not living.

hm maybe we could use both but they would need a better discription to distinguish the two or we just mix it up under one tag
well it kind of depends from picture to picture sometime the latex is just there to form clothing or sex toys other times there are sentient characters consisting of that

in that case we need to resort some of the art that is in there...
hm so if we say

living_latex is sentient_latex

maybe we call it rather like that and in addition say that

living_latex is liquid_latex but
liquid_latex is not always living_latex

prokura said:
maybe we call it rather like that and in addition say that

living_latex is liquid_latex but
liquid_latex is not always living_latex

No, liquid latex is only when it appears to be liquid, pouring over something or forming a sticky coating over it. Living latex is only for when it appears to be a living thing itself, rather than being pulled around by a character. In some cases, these can both happen, such as if it has its own head that isn't yet covering the victim's.

Furrin_Gok said:
No, liquid latex is only when it appears to be liquid, pouring over something or forming a sticky coating over it. Living latex is only for when it appears to be a living thing itself, rather than being pulled around by a character. In some cases, these can both happen, such as if it has its own head that isn't yet covering the victim's.

ok that seems good as an explanation so would someone like to update the wiki index for both?

I'd just like to reopen this discussion - I also just tried to submit an alias for liquid latex and living latex, only to find that this thread was already a thing.

I think the points about liquid latex not always being living latex and vice-versa make sense, though - still, it's kind of awkward that we have these two tags that are, in practice, mostly unknown, and end up being used near-interchangeably anyway.

The tag alias living_latex -> liquid_latex (forum #256006) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.