Implicating tribadism_on_penis → group
Link to implication

Reason:

Requires at least three individuals to work

EDIT: The tag implication tribadism_on_penis -> group (forum #249032) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Chain it through group_sex instead.

Genjar said:
Chain it through group_sex instead.

+1

tribadism_on_penis I-> group_sex I-> group, sex

is better than

tribadism_on_penis I-> group
group_sex I-> group, sex

Are there any instances of tribadism_on_penis that would not also count as a pussyjob?

BlueDingo said:
+1

tribadism_on_penis I-> group_sex I-> group, sex

is better than

tribadism_on_penis I-> group
group_sex I-> group, sex

+1

Are there any instances of tribadism_on_penis that would not also count as a pussyjob?

I... uh.. hm.

Srs though, it... LOOKS like it would be a 100% thing.

This tag is defined...wrongly. Tribadism is actually just rubbing a vag on anything. If a female character rubs her vag against another character's arm or leg, that's also tribadism. I think porn is responsible for narrowing the definition down to just vag on vag...sort of like "interracial" almost exclusively means black male on white female in the porn world, but obviously that's not the real definition. So tribadism_on_penis can actually include only two characters.

However, if we just want to ignore the literal definition of tribadism it's fine, but I just thought I'd bring that up.

Dyrone said:
This tag is defined...wrongly. Tribadism is actually just rubbing a vag on anything. If a female character rubs her vag against another character's arm or leg, that's also tribadism. I think porn is responsible for narrowing the definition down to just vag on vag...sort of like "interracial" almost exclusively means black male on white female in the porn world, but obviously that's not the real definition. So tribadism_on_penis can actually include only two characters.

However, if we just want to ignore the literal definition of tribadism it's fine, but I just thought I'd bring that up.

Well, I think most of us are open to the idea of a new tag, if you can think of one. :)

Dyrone said:
This tag is defined...wrongly. Tribadism is actually just rubbing a vag on anything. If a female character rubs her vag against another character's arm or leg, that's also tribadism. I think porn is responsible for narrowing the definition down to just vag on vag...sort of like "interracial" almost exclusively means black male on white female in the porn world, but obviously that's not the real definition. So tribadism_on_penis can actually include only two characters.

However, if we just want to ignore the literal definition of tribadism it's fine, but I just thought I'd bring that up.

We have a tag for two-person tribbadism_on_penis, it's pussyjob

Genjar said:
Chain it through group_sex instead.

Ah, didn't even think of that, you're right.

The tag implication tribadism_on_penis -> group (forum #249032) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.