Implicating autobukkake → excessive_cum
Link to implication

Reason:

From the wiki:
"When a character ejaculates an excessive amount of cum on themselves, thus creating the illusion of bukkake."

EDIT: The tag implication autobukkake -> excessive_cum (forum #250463) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

I'm not sure if realistically this should be implicated, but the current wording on the wiki absolutely supports this.

The wording on the wiki supports it, but what about bukkake requires it to be excessive? Isn't that a false definition? I thought bukkake was about where the cum is going, not how much of it there is.

My other question is whether or not an autobukkake tag is even necessary. It's rather ambiguous--unless we give it a strict definition of cumming on one's own face--and is easily found with cum_on_self and whatever other tags one wants to specify.

Aster_Viridian said:
I thought bukkake was about where the cum is going, not how much of it there is.

No, bukkake is a large group of characters ejaculating on a single character. Solo characters covered in cum are simply cum_covered, not bukkake (with rare exceptions, such as multiple cumshots homing in from offscreen).

It's frequently mistagged.

Anyway, autobukkake is a combo of cum_on_self + cum_covered + excessive_cum, and doesn't have much to do with bukkake. Needs a better name, except I can't think of one.

(By the way, the current autobukkake -> cum implication is redundant, since that's already chained through cum_on_self implication.)

Genjar said:
No, bukkake is a large group of characters ejaculating on a single character. Solo characters covered in cum are simply cum_covered, not bukkake (with rare exceptions, such as multiple cumshots homing in from offscreen).

Well yes I know the full definition of bukkake but my point was bukkake is about where the cum is going (definitively, from multiple characters onto someone's face) and has nothing to do with quantity itself. Bukkake involves multiple characters ejaculating on a single character but even if the character is covered in cum that doesn't necessarily imply it's an excessive amount. It can still be a "normal" amount of cum, as coming from many characters.

Like you say, autobukkake needs a better name, since its implications are somewhat confusingly different from bukkake itself, at least to me.

The tag implication autobukkake -> excessive_cum (forum #250463) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.