Topic: Tag Alias: car_sex -> sex_in_car

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

-1. What if it's sex taking place on the hood of a car? That's not inside of a car.

Updated by anonymous

ImpidiDinkaDoo said:
-1. What if it's sex taking place on the hood of a car? That's not inside of a car.

Yeah, I guess you're right.

Updated by anonymous

Since car_sex is kinda ambiguous should it be aliased away, or should it be used as a catchall for tags based around 'sexual activity that also includes a car in the post'?

I'm personally not invested in the car_sex tag and think it may be better to alias it to sex, car, or invalid_tag (or something else).

Regardless of car_sex, I'm thinking it would be best to implicate sex_in_car, on_hood, car_trunk, and dragons_having_sex_with_cars (and inside_car, as per the request submitted in forum #276961) to car, since each tag would require a car to be featured in the post in order for those tags to be applicable themselves.

Updated by anonymous

Bumping this, since this alias needs to be rejected before the alias below can be submitted.

I think it would be best to disambiguate car_sex, since it could be referring to one of several different tags (as described by my previous post) (However, I'm currently unsure about those other implications I had suggested).

Tags For Another BUR

alias car_sex -> car_sex_(disambiguation)
category car_sex_(disambiguation) -> invalid

user_187249 said:
... {the old} alias {at start of topic} needs to be rejected before the alias below can be submitted.
...

Tags For Another BUR

alias car_sex -> car_sex_(disambiguation)
category car_sex_(disambiguation) -> invalid

Well the old alias suggestion got rejected a month ago,
and I agree about disambiguating the car_sex tag, sooo....

I think that new BUR (car_sex -> car_sex_(disambiguation))
should be posted to this forum topic ... to keep the car_sex forum-posts together,
(EDIT) or should car_sex_(disambiguation) get a seperate forum topic?

Updated

Watsit

Privileged

listerthesquirrel said:
Well the old alias suggestion got rejected a month ago,
and I agree about disambiguating the car_sex tag, sooo....

I think that new BUR (car_sex -> car_sex_(disambiguation))
should be posted to this forum topic ... to keep the car_sex forum-posts together,
or is that a terrible idea?

I really don't know what's going on with disambiguations. One admin I always see rejecting them, and another I see approving them. I don't know if there's some internal conflict about this, or if there's some unspoken guidelines for which are acceptable and which aren't. But from my perspective, there doesn't seem to be any guide for what disambiguations would be acceptable.

watsit said:
I really don't know what's going on with disambiguations. One admin I always see rejecting them, and another I see approving them. ....

Looking at topic #35332 (title "Aliases, disambiguations, and burs, oh my [why a lot of them are getting rejected]"):

rainbow_dash said:
... I know everyone is starting to riot over the string of disambiguations getting rejected, and that's totally fair.
...
Here's how it's going to work going forward, as it pertains to disambiguations in particular.

Disambiguations are going to be used on tags that are frequently intermixed with each other. ...
...
Before a disambiguation is accepted, wikis need to be filled out for each page. Aliasing it to a disambiguation, only for a user to click on it and be drop kicked to an empty page isn't going to work. You don't need to fill out the wikis before suggesting the disambiguation! Suggest it, get a thumbs up, make wikis, it gets approved.
...

so hurdle 1 is if car_sex is different content intermixed:

* * * * DRAFT in progress below * * * *
car_sex has 165 post: (probably look through latest 75 posts for this initial look-through)

A) sex_IN_car :
a1) post #3632047 ,
a2) post #3587022 (limousine wiki says "a luxury car...")
a3,4,&5) post #3422175 (and 2 variant posts)

* * *

B) sex_IN_vehicle :
b1) post #3623239 (inside view, so unclear what vehicle it is)
b2&3) post #3608827 and post #3608821 (probably an air or space vehicle: looked at https://half-life.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Aircraft , and some other HL vehicles and couldn't figure out which vehicle in artwork)
b4) (post #3608824 is in same sequence, but vehicle not obvious .. probably remove car_sex tag for this one)
b5,6,7,8,9)(in truck) five posts in pool #30561
b10) post #3574788 (in vehicle, possibly a car ... but too closeup to tell what vehicle)
b11) (in van) post #3559959
b12to15) post #3538742 and post #3523249 , post #3498733 , post #3473624
b16) (truck) post #3462086 (i assume HALF-inside vehicle counts as inside-vehicle)
b17) post #3423380 (not very obvious, but sex-in-vehicle seems plausible)
* * *

C) sex_ON_vehicle (overlap with on_car):
c1 to 3) post #3602006 , post #3574512 and post #3495370

Only sex-on-vehicle tag seems to be sex_on_kart,
(with honorable mention for sex_on_a_horse with one post ... though seems like there would be other posts)

* * *
(getting late, got as far as post #3422175 ... so did 25 posts)

Updated

Concerning car_sex, what about if it's someone having sex with a car? Or a car having sex with them? Or two cars having sex regardless of any squishy flesh creatures in or near them?

clawstripe said:
Concerning car_sex, what about if it's someone having sex with a car? Or a car having sex with them? Or two cars having sex regardless of any squishy flesh creatures in or near them?

"someone having sex with a car? Or a car having sex with them?"
I think both of those could be covered by tag sex_with_car (one post already tagged with sex_with_car)

vehicle wiki

lists various types:

etc etc.

So suggest sex_with_vehicle as umbrella tag.

***

"Or two cars having sex regardless of any squishy flesh creatures in or near them?"

Since there are tags such as male/female, male/male, etc:
how about vehicle/vehicle??

Continuing looking through car_sex posts: (continuing numbering from previous list)

new post since list above :
U1) post #3647640 (in my opinion too close up for location to be obvious)
(U for uncertain)

***

A) sex_in_car (default is: looks like in vehicle, probably a car)
a6) post #3389111
a7&8) post #3388132 and variant
a9&10) post #3382379 and variant
a11 to 14) post #3378629 , post #3376344 , post #3351954 and post #3329399
a15&16) post #3307778 and variant

***

B) sex_IN_vehicle :
b18) post #3411563 (could be a car, don't see enough of vehicle)
b19) post #3405251 (tweet text says "Coco Taxi", so maybe in a taxi)
b20) post #3402618 (from the artwork, probably in a van)
b21,22&23) post #3399222 and post #3392419 and post #3387628 (upper-right of artwork makes it look like it COULD be in vehicle)
b24) post 3341895 (warning:cub, Rating: Explicit)
b25) post #3321149 (in vehicle?)
b26) post #3303622 (in vehicle. In car??)

***

C) sex_ON_vehicle
c4&5) post #3413244 and post #3401813
c6&7) post #3304951 and variant

***

D) sex WITH vehicle
d1) post #3321708 (car?) vehicle penetrated

***
U) uncertain
u2) post #3381457 (location not clear, those two windows could be apartment windows)

(running low on energy, got as far as post #3303182 ... so that's 52 post so far)

  • 1