News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

Topic: Can't find robotic sex slave animation

Posted under Art Talk

This has seriously been driving me crazy. I can't seem to find this short animation of this canine/rainbow(ish) lady being raped by this robotic figure while he explains how he will break her. She is cuffed in one scene and is blowing him in another if that helps. His end quote is "such a smooth/pretty bod".

Anyone know where to find this? It's a sad but really good animation.

Updated by yFlash

It's a Trunchbull animation. She issued a takedown of all NSFW art here: takedown #5002

You may be able to find it on her FA gallery, otherwise you're SOL

Updated by anonymous

I checked her FA, and it's not there. Damn. Thanks for trying to help, though. I wonder why she would do that.

Updated by anonymous

HomelessMice said:
I checked her FA, and it's not there. Damn. Thanks for trying to help, though. I wonder why she would do that.

Trunchbull seems to have deleted a lot of the works from the link Siral gave from her own gallery.

In fact, searching her gallery only showed up two images: Was this canine gal the one you were talking about?

Updated by anonymous

You know what, "no. You may not be SOL" *edited out because of possible ruling* because I may have found it. I don't watch rape animations (usually), so check the link and see if it is what you are looking for.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
You know what, no. You may not be SOL because I may have found it. I don't watch rape animations (usually), so check the link and see if it is what you are looking for.

That would apparently be Steve and Shokun. Images depicting Shokun were removed from some sites under "Copyright" claim, but that may just be the artist's copyright being used so that Trunchbull could remove her art from areas.

Not sure why she would remove it from every gallery of hers, but considering some of the animations she's been making, maybe those two are becoming their own little cartoon or movie?

Updated by anonymous

leomole

Former Staff
2014 anthro biped bottle bottomless brown_body brown_fur brown_nose brown_tail casual_exposure chair clothed clothing computer container desk detailed_background digital_media_(artwork) domestic_cat electronics eyebrows eyelashes felid feline felis femboy footwear fur furniture green_eyes hair headphones hoodie inside jailbird leaning leaning_backward legwear liam_(liam-kun) looking_at_viewer looking_back male mammal multicolored_body multicolored_fur multicolored_tail office_chair reclining shaded short_hair sitting slim smile snout socks solo table tail tan_body tan_fur tan_hair tan_tail topwear two_tone_body two_tone_fur two_tone_tail

A few weeks ago Trunchbull was hired by an art company. I'm happy for her, but sad she had to take down all her adult content. Send me a message if you want an archive of her animations. (Or if you're Trunchbull and don't want me to.)

Updated by anonymous

leomole said:

I wouldn't wait for a negative: Just don't do it.

I'm baffled as to how someone can acknowledge that an artist took down their explicit work for the sake of their career, then offer to share said explicit work in the next sentence.

Updated by anonymous

Knotty_Curls said:
I wouldn't wait for a negative: Just don't do it.

I'm baffled as to how someone can acknowledge that an artist took down their explicit work for the sake of their career, then offer to share said explicit work in the next sentence.

Some people can appreciate the artwork as well as the artist.

Updated by anonymous

Ratte

Former Staff
2023 4_toes alpha_channel anthro barefoot beyle border brown_hair canid canine canis carrying_another claws clothed clothing conditional_dnp coyote digital_drawing_(artwork) digital_media_(artwork) duo faraden feet female fluffy fox fully_clothed hair hi_res hoodie hybrid jacket kasai_(coyote) leaf legacy_(ratte) long_hair male mammal new_faraden on_shoulders open_mouth outside paws plant plantigrade ratte red_fox red_hair short_hair signature smile text toe_claws toes topwear traditional_media_(artwork) transparent_border tree true_fox twig url yellow_eyes

Siral_Exan said:
Some people can appreciate the artwork as well as the artist.

And some people can actually respect the artist's wishes.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
And what are the artist's wishes, then? As far as this entire thread has gone, and including the IRC, it sounds like she was forced to remove her art because of a company, and that takedown doesn't help at all. Opinions seem to be a cause, but not a stated cause. Mind you, before you generalize me: I did what Knotty said, I'm just a blind man trying to help another blind person...

Care to elaborate?

I'd guess that her wishes are to work with a company that wants her adult artwork to disappear.

Updated by anonymous

Ratte

Former Staff
2023 4_toes alpha_channel anthro barefoot beyle border brown_hair canid canine canis carrying_another claws clothed clothing conditional_dnp coyote digital_drawing_(artwork) digital_media_(artwork) duo faraden feet female fluffy fox fully_clothed hair hi_res hoodie hybrid jacket kasai_(coyote) leaf legacy_(ratte) long_hair male mammal new_faraden on_shoulders open_mouth outside paws plant plantigrade ratte red_fox red_hair short_hair signature smile text toe_claws toes topwear traditional_media_(artwork) transparent_border tree true_fox twig url yellow_eyes

Siral_Exan said:
And what are the artist's wishes, then? As far as this entire thread has gone, and including the IRC, it sounds like she was forced to remove her art because of a company, and that takedown doesn't help at all. Opinions seem to be a cause, but not a stated cause. Mind you, before you generalize me: I did what Knotty said, I'm just a blind man trying to help another blind person...

Care to elaborate?

If someone has to resort to looking through another's private archive in order to see something, and not the artist's own gallery, it's probably meant to not be publicly viewable anymore. This isn't hard so I don't know why you have to make it out to be.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
And what are the artist's wishes, then? As far as this entire thread has gone, and including the IRC, it sounds like she was forced to remove her art because of a company, and that takedown doesn't help at all. Opinions seem to be a cause, but not a stated cause. Mind you, before you generalize me: I did what Knotty said, I'm just a blind man trying to help another blind person...

Care to elaborate?

This shouldn't even be a question. If artist has gone their way to remove artwork from their personal galleries and file takedown on sites like this, it's pretty clear that they wish their work not to be available anywhere in any form. It does not matter if it was forced by someone or if it was their own free choise, if the creator says no, it means no. Linking to external site hosting content againts artists wish is far from great idea.

I can kinda understand the blind helping blind thing, as it's simply trying to help someone to find content they remember seeing, but you should know to stop at the point where it's clear that the content has been removed both here and the original sources and just state that "it has been nuked".

For this, Knotty already covered it. I do remember this animation from the users description above because it was posted to youtube for some reason, if it's the same, then the character in it was this:

ambiguous_gender animated avoid_posting conditional_dnp digital_media_(artwork) disembodied_hand duo lagomorph leporid low_res machine mammal petting purple_eyes rabbit reaction_image robot short_playtime simple_background solo_focus steve_(trunchbull) trunchbull white_background

Updated by anonymous

Everything else aside

I like the rape scene for its voice acting. Very well done, from what I remember.

Updated by anonymous

leomole

Former Staff
2014 anthro biped bottle bottomless brown_body brown_fur brown_nose brown_tail casual_exposure chair clothed clothing computer container desk detailed_background digital_media_(artwork) domestic_cat electronics eyebrows eyelashes felid feline felis femboy footwear fur furniture green_eyes hair headphones hoodie inside jailbird leaning leaning_backward legwear liam_(liam-kun) looking_at_viewer looking_back male mammal multicolored_body multicolored_fur multicolored_tail office_chair reclining shaded short_hair sitting slim smile snout socks solo table tail tan_body tan_fur tan_hair tan_tail topwear two_tone_body two_tone_fur two_tone_tail

Knotty_Curls said:
I'm baffled as to how someone can acknowledge that an artist took down their explicit work for the sake of their career, then offer to share said explicit work

Ratte said:
If someone has to resort to looking through another's private archive in order to see something

Mario69 said:
it's pretty clear that they wish their work not to be available anywhere in any form

The archive that I am offering to share was created for this purpose by the artist herself, who expressed regret that she had to take everything down. I left a disclaimer in my comment in case this changes but I don't think it will, the employer required only that adult content be taken down from "easy-to-access sites." Sorry for the confusion everyone.

Updated by anonymous

There was another archive with everything but I can't access either of them now. Not much of a big deal for me since I cannot really remember much of anything from trunchbull's animations besides the one with a shark and snake I actually saved.

Updated by anonymous

Trunchbull has made a new account and re uploaded the robot sex slave video

Updated by anonymous

Woah, that was a very useful necro. Thank you very much.

Updated by anonymous

Over 18?

You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.