Aliasing teabag → tea_bag
Link to alias

Reason:

The tags teapot (382 posts) and tea_pot (151 posts) are the same with the exception of an additional underscore. Even though teapot is more populated, I think tea_pot should be used instead to fit with the formatting of tea_cup. The same reasoning goes for teabag (31 posts) and tea_bag (12 posts).

I also noticed a tea_kettle tag though I'm not sure whether it should be aliased to tea_pot or implicated to it instead. The tea_kettle tag seems to be used on tea_pots with a kettle-like handle (for some of the posts at least, the rest appear to be the same as a standard tea_pot).

Tag Alias:

• teabag -> tea_bag (needs cleanup before aliasing, several mistagged tea_bagging posts)
• teapot -> tea_pot

Forum:

• forum #263774 - Tag Alias: tea_pot -> teapot

EDIT: The tag alias teabag -> tea_bag (forum #279086) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

huh, is there not one for.. oh there is but it has "ing" at the end. nevermind.

+1

The tag alias #35889 teabag -> tea_bag has been approved.
(above line being new alias link style)

This alias sounds good to me.

teabag : 47 posts
tea_bag : 24 posts

user_187249 said:
...

Tag Alias:

• teabag -> tea_bag (needs cleanup before aliasing, several mistagged tea_bagging posts)

...

EDIT: Cleaned up tea_bag tag:
A) post #2171314 the character seems to giant and tea_bagging a city, changing tag
B) removing tag from post #1723802 ... posture would be tea_bagging, BUT no one below him to tea bag (and the thing on his ear is probably an ear_tag).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

EDIT: cleaned-up teabag tag:
1) not sure about post #2697516 (maybe some tea-bags in between coffee grinders and front door?)
2) post #2691571 , don't see bag of tea ... looking like tea_bagging.
3) post #2663867 , removed teabag tag (don't see bag of tea, already tagged with tea_bagging)
4) post #2543333 , changed tag from teabag to tea_bagging (no bag of tea. tea_bagging tag seems reasonable )
5) post #2318796 , - teabag tag (saw no bag of tea). Already tagged with tea_bagging.
6) post #2224909 and post #1745413 : teabag -> tea_bagging. Saw no bag of tea, I think image includes tea_bagging.
7) post #2197262 : - teabag tag (saw no bag of tea). Already tagged with tea_bagging .
8) post #2122502 : - teabag tag (saw no bag of tea). Already tagged with tea_bagging .
9) WARNING: castration : #2042585 : teabag (saw no bag of tea) -> tea_bagging (looks kind like tea_bagging ... balls not being lowered, but they are bouncing against her face
10) post #1627652 : teabag (saw no bag of tea) -> tea_bagging (looks like tea_bagging )
11) post #1559422 : teabag (saw no bag of tea) -> tea_bagging (looks like tea_bagging )
12) post #1451968 , and post #1451965
13) post #1276097 : teabag (saw no bag of tea) -> tea_bagging (looks like tea_bagging ... i think)

14) WARNING: VORE: wondering about post #1152618 : - teabag (saw no bag of tea). Can you be tea_bagging someone if they are inside you????

15) post #1090466 : - teabag tag (saw no bag of tea). Already tagged with tea_bagging .

16) wondering also about post #348235 : - teabag (no bag of tea). i realize tagger was thinking tea_bagging, but no balls nor genitals visible and RATED SAFE.

And so now all the teabag and 'tea_bag' posts should now show a bag of tea. (except not sure if bag of tea at post #2697516 ... again, maybe tea between coffee grinders and front door )

The bulk update request #2499 is pending approval.

mass update teabag -> tea_bag_(infuser)
mass update tea_bag -> tea_bag_(infuser)
create alias teabag_(infuser) (0) -> tea_bag_(infuser) (0)
mass update tea_bagging -> tea_bagging_(sexual)
remove alias teabagging (0) -> tea_bagging (867)

Reason: Giving these tags a suffix to help prevent future mistags, since it had to be cleaned out.

It might seem unlikely to you, but it seems a strong possibility to me that somebody could tag tea_bagging for the act of bouncing their literal tea bag in their cup of hot water.

Actually a quick problem I've run into on tea_bagging's side as I verify all of them were the sexual act:
post #3311170
Some images are tagged when it's straight up penetration. These don't count whatsoever, right?
post #3247678
This one's got the dick on the fox, not the balls. Do we count that?
post #3282917 post #3288414
There's further a lot of these_aren't_my_glasses under the tag. I definitely feel these are mistags--unless the character is displayed alongside motion lines (or better: in a slideshow or animation) to prove that they're bouncing their balls there, that particular tag should be kept separate from tea_bagging.

Furrin has some good questions.

Let's start with e621's wiki for tea bagging "The act of lowering testicles to touch with someone else. (Like dipping a tea bag in water.)"

Wikipedia has more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teabagging
"Teabagging is a slang term for the sexual act involving someone placing their scrotum in the mouth of their sexual partner for sexual pleasure, or onto the face or head of another person, sometimes as a comedic device. ..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teabagging#In_video_games
"Teabagging in video games involves a player character rapidly and repeatedly crouching over the corpse of another player controlled character, as a form of humiliation or to provoke the other player. ..."

Another question is whether video game teabagging should be lumped in with tea_bagging_(sexual),
or whether it gets seperate tag ... perhaps tea_bagging_(gaming) ???

furrin_gok wrote:
Actually a quick problem I've run into on tea_bagging's side as I verify all of them were the sexual act:
post #3311170
Some images are tagged when it's straight up penetration. These don't count whatsoever, right?

I don't see any version of teabagging in that 3311170 post.

post #3247678
This one's got the dick on the fox, not the balls. Do we count that?

I can understand why the tagger's added tea_bagging tag, as that image could be interpreted as balls slightly touching head,
but i agree the penis is on fox's head instead.
Changed that post from tea_bagging to penis_on_head

post #3282917 post #3288414
There's further a lot of these_aren't_my_glasses under the tag. I definitely feel these are mistags--unless the character is displayed alongside motion lines (or better: in a slideshow or animation) to prove that they're bouncing their balls there, that particular tag should be kept separate from tea_bagging.

I think motion lines (or other indication of movement) would be wanted for tea_bagging_(gaming)(if that tag is acceptable)

but no motion lines needed for tea_bagging_(sexual)
and think those two examples would both qualify for tea_bagging_(sexual),
(under "Teabagging is ... someone placing their scrotum ... onto the face or head of another person, ..." from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teabagging )

Teapot is how the word is spelled , there's no space in any source I can find; likewise "tea bag" and "tea cup" are also correctly spelled as one word "teabag" and "teacup", although tea cup can be justified as specifying a cup meant for tea, like "coffee cup" or "measuring cup".

If anything, based on correct spelling and usage, the alias should be

tea_bag -> teabag
tea_pot -> teapot
tea_cup -> teacup
tea_bagging -> teabagging

teabagging could be "teabagging_(act)" or something if we're really concerned with ambiguity, but I have my doubts that it's likely someone will have a post depicting a character dipping a teabag into a cup and decide to tag it as "teabagging"... I think it's more likely someone will misunderstand "teabag" vs "teabagging", but I don't think that mistag will be common enough to warrant clunky additions to the tag name.

hungrymaple said:
Teapot is how the word is spelled , there's no space in any source I can find; likewise "tea bag" and "tea cup" are also correctly spelled as one word "teabag" and "teacup", although tea cup can be justified as specifying a cup meant for tea, like "coffee cup" or "measuring cup".

If anything, based on correct spelling and usage, the alias should be

tea_bag -> teabag
tea_pot -> teapot
tea_cup -> teacup
tea_bagging -> teabagging

teabagging could be "teabagging_(act)" or something if we're really concerned with ambiguity, but I have my doubts that it's likely someone will have a post depicting a character dipping a teabag into a cup and decide to tag it as "teabagging"... I think it's more likely someone will misunderstand "teabag" vs "teabagging", but I don't think that mistag will be common enough to warrant clunky additions to the tag name.

Taking your teapot links: Merriam Webster disagrees. Teacup and Teapot are one word, Tea bag is two.

furrin_gok said:
Taking your teapot links: Merriam Webster disagrees. Teacup and Teapot are one word, Tea bag is two.

You're correct, although it appears both "tea bag" and "teabag" are valid, Wikipedia uses both, Oxford and Cambridge dictionaries use the compound word, Merriam Webster only uses the separate words. It could be a difference in how the dictionaries are written, or difference between US and UK/Commonwealth/"Non-American" English. In that case, whatever has more tags/wiki definition should take precedence but it doesn't really matter to me.

The tag alias teabag -> tea_bag (forum #279086) has been approved by @bitWolfy.