Topic: Tag Implication: glasses_only -> eyewear_only

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating glasses_only → eyewear_only
Link to implication

Reason:

I think there should be a catchall for some of the *_only tags, that presently aren't in-use (namely eyewear_only, handwear_only, headgear_only, headwear_only, and topwear_only). I'm also adding some currently unused suggestions that seem like they could be populated (goggles_only, sunglasses_only, boxing_gloves_only, etc).

Also on here are some other *_only implication suggestions that are currently seeing use.

Tag Implication Removal:

Tag Implication:

Updated by dubstepboy420

maybe also underwear_only -> topless

nitpick: topwear_only and bottomless kinda feel like the same tag stated different ways from what you've implicated to topwear_only. maybe just implicate straight to bottomless instead for those tags and use topwear_only for glasses, gloves, hats, etc. then implicate topwear_only -> mostly_nude.

+1

Updated by anonymous

Watsit said:
Underwear can also include bras.

ah, mb. role that back to "maybe also panties_only -> topless" then.

would kind of like it if there was an *_only tag for just underwear that covered the groin area

if not then maybe also:
boxers_only -> topless
briefs_only -> topless
boxer_briefs_only -> topless
thong_only -> topless
g-string_only -> topless

and *_only -> * for each of these as well including panties

Updated by anonymous

  • 1