Sometimes when a (usually male) character undergoes latex/goo/inflatable/living_plushie transformation, their genitals are replaced with a nondescript bulge, essentially making them a nullo or what we call "featureless_crotch". This is often left untagged, but is sometimes tagged null_bulge. Null_bulge is defined as:

A round rubber bulge. Prevents the wearer from touching themselves, similar to a big soft chastity cage

If the null bulge has a lock icon on it, which is a common trope with these types of pics, it is occasionally tagged lock_bulge. If hypnosis is involved (another common trope), it may be tagged drone.

Anyways, on to my actual question... I was looking through chastity_(disambiguation) for tag clean-up, and I stumbled across these two pics:
post #2176251 post #2174964
How should I clean up chastity_(disambiguation) for these types of pics? Should they both be tagged null_bulge and the latter be tagged drone? Is lock_bulge even worth keeping as a tag? Should orgasm_denial or chastity_device be tagged? I think chastity_device only applies to chastity_cages and chastity_belts?

EDIT: I've replaced chastity_(disambiguation) with null_bulge in both pics

crocogator said:
and the latter be tagged drone?

o_O what is this?
seriously no idea, a brief summary for the wiki, at the very least, would be good

I was asking about this on the Discord when I uploaded it:
post #2176314

And ended up thinking it should be rubber_suit and bulge given "null bulge" is just a bulge under latex. There's no way to know if it's just latex with a pattern or actual chastity with TWYS.

Maybe null_bulge could be a lore tag however.

Edit:
Just asked on the discord and null_bulge would be ok to tag given it's a feature of the suit and can be identified by the lock icon.

pup said:
I was asking about this on the Discord when I uploaded it:
post #2176314

And ended up thinking it should be rubber_suit and bulge given "null bulge" is just a bulge under latex. There's no way to know if it's just latex with a pattern or actual chastity with TWYS.

Maybe null_bulge could be a lore tag however.

Edit:
Just asked on the discord and null_bulge would be ok to tag given it's a feature of the suit and can be identified by the lock icon.

Yeah, null_bulge is sorta a fuzzy area with TWYS, but at least the iconic lock symbol can make it clear. I'll go ahead and replace chastity_(disambiguation) with null_bulge on both pics.

bipface said:
o_O what is this?
seriously no idea, a brief summary for the wiki, at the very least, would be good

Admittedly, I only discovered this tag while researching for this thread, and it seems to be used in several ways, though all but one are related.

• The actual flying device (unrelated to the other uses): post #2057543
• the character is trapped in a latex suit or has undergone goo_transformation and has been brainwashed as indicated by...
• ...spiral_eyes post #1610487
• ...having a visor with a digital display on their face. Their display might say "awaiting orders", "obey", "deleting... [brain]", show a swirly hyno pattern, etc. post #1823929 post #1456884
• ...speaking like a brainwashed robot. They may say something like ">Installing brainwash.exe... Done. >Awaiting orders...", etc. post #1867953
• ...wearing a gas mask post #1991951. I'm not sure what gas masks have to do with hypnosis, but I guess people think they're related?

How about this for a definition of drone :

post #1443074 post #1574732 post #1494165
When a character is wearing a rubber suit, coating of goo, etc. that brain washes or "reprograms" them.

See Also:

• hypnosis
• rubber_suit
• goo_transformation

Further confusion in the month-old chastity_bulge wiki, which (at time of posting) states that null_bulge is for non-chastity instances.
Meanwhile null_bulge still says it's a chastity thing.

I think that is likely mixing up null_bulge and when a sexless featureless_crotch character's pubic mound is emphasised? Or is the thought that it's for non-chastity-specific goo-encasement?
Either way I think that null_bulge should likely be aliased to chastity_bulge or just disambiguated, as it's already getting entangled in nullification which is supposed to be for outright removal of genitalia.

Edit: At the very least lock_bulge should implicate chastity_bulge