Topic: [APPROVED] BUR only ('*_only' tag stuff)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Monsterbomb10010

Member

The bulk update request #116 is active.

remove implication hat_only (9247) -> mostly_nude (124918)
remove implication hat_only (9247) -> headwear (224257)
create implication hat_only (9247) -> hat (206266)
create implication hat_only (9247) -> headwear_only (10545)
create implication headwear_only (10545) -> headwear (224257)
create implication headwear_only (10545) -> mostly_nude (124918)
create implication headwear_only (10545) -> headgear_only (11979)
create implication headgear_only (11979) -> headgear (293383)
create implication helmet_only (1001) -> helmet (30246)
create implication helmet_only (1001) -> headgear_only (11979)
create implication mask_only (941) -> mask (48940)
create implication mask_only (941) -> nude (1257425)
create implication sunglasses_only (1246) -> sunglasses (33322)
create implication sunglasses_only (1246) -> eyewear_only (9983)
create implication glasses_only (7678) -> glasses (215993)
create implication eyewear_only (9983) -> nude (1257425)
create implication boots_only (1948) -> boots (76572)
create implication boots_only (1948) -> footwear_only (8737)
create implication sandals_only (256) -> sandals (14540)
create implication sandals_only (256) -> footwear_only (8737)
create implication socks_only (2123) -> socks (64907)
create implication socks_only (2123) -> mostly_nude (124918)
create implication underwear_only (20893) -> underwear (364383)
create implication underwear_only (20893) -> clothed (1153467)
create implication panties_only (2982) -> underwear_only (20893)
create implication panties_only (2982) -> topless (131435)
create implication bra_only (347) -> bra (69176)
create implication bra_only (347) -> underwear_only (20893)
create implication bra_only (347) -> bottomless (156620)
create implication topwear_only (10359) -> topwear (543386)
create implication topwear_only (10359) -> bottomless (156620)
create implication coat_only (206) -> coat (21146)
create implication coat_only (206) -> topwear_only (10359)
create implication shirt_only (4184) -> shirt (327386)
create implication shirt_only (4184) -> topwear_only (10359)
create implication hoodie_only (2169) -> hoodie (51195)
create implication hoodie_only (2169) -> topwear_only (10359)
create implication robe_only (710) -> robe (19114)
create implication robe_only (710) -> mostly_nude (124918)
create implication scarf_only (2650) -> mostly_nude (124918)
create implication gloves_only (3142) -> gloves (193800)
create implication gloves_only (3142) -> handwear_only (3405)
create implication handwear_only (3405) -> handwear (203034)
create implication handwear_only (3405) -> mostly_nude (124918)

Reason: When a user gives some *_only tags attention, and nothing else...

Also see implication #29810 (panties_only -> panties)

EDIT: The bulk update request #116 (forum #293104) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

Shouldn't those aliases be implications? Also hat_only -> hat and helmet_only -> helmet implications would make sense too.

user 187249

Member

+1, and nothing else...

Actually, there is something else. I noticed a few implications missing from the list.

Extra Implications

create implication glasses_only -> glasses
create implication handwear_only -> handwear
create implication panties_only -> panties

I'm also unsure about the eyewear_only/mask_only -> nude implications. I guess it depends whether or not a 'non-clothing_only' tag (collar_only, eyewear_only) and a 'clothing_only' tag (headwear_only, footwear_only) can be used on the same post.

Genjar

Former Staff

strikerman said:
Not mostly nude?

Wondered about that myself. Accessories don't count as clothing, so if masks are accessories then it's nude. But perhaps those should be considered clothing.

  • 1