The bulk update request #199 is active.

remove implication peeing (18356) -> urine (26919)

Reason: Because sometimes, you can't see the actual urine, but it's blatantly obvious somebody's peeing.

EDIT: The bulk update request #199 (forum #294763) has been approved by @Millcore.

It makes sense but I do wonder if it'll result in urine getting undertagged, which will be bad for the people who want to blacklist that.

I suppose there'd also be instances in which it's not urine coming out. Perhaps blood, Kool-Aid, or some freakish symbiote thing.

I just lost my appetite. :(

faucet said:
It makes sense but I do wonder if it'll result in urine getting undertagged, which will be bad for the people who want to blacklist that.

The only reason that would happen, would be people not noticing that they can no longer rely on the system to auto-add urine for them, when they tag peeing. And in that case, the fix is as simple as letting them know.

clawstripe said:
I suppose there'd also be instances in which it's not urine coming out. Perhaps blood, Kool-Aid, or some freakish symbiote thing.

I just lost my appetite. :(

That's rough, buddy.

clawstripe said:
I suppose there'd also be instances in which it's not urine coming out. Perhaps blood, Kool-Aid, or some freakish symbiote thing.

I just lost my appetite. :(

There are a few notable ones right now if you search 'feral' and 'equine', where the character in question is peeing other liquids. That said, I am not in favor of this change.

It finally occurred to me there are indeed examples where this implication could be considered inappropriate. Whether this is enough to convince anyone is a good question.
_________________

barstibly, n. Archaic. A device such as a china horse or small, naked porcelain infant once used by jocular hosts to piss water into your Scotch. ~ Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

clawstripe said:
It finally occurred to me there are indeed examples where this implication could be considered inappropriate. Whether this is enough to convince anyone is a good question.
_________________

There is also that, yes.

also unusual_urine exists, which is seemingly somewhat undertagged (and also should probably be unusual_urination)

The bulk update request #199 (forum #294763) has been approved by @Millcore.