The bulk update request #404 is active.

create alias seducing (0) -> seductive (148843)
create alias seductive_gaze (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_gaze (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seductive_stare (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_stare (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seductive_face (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_face (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seductive_expression (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_expression (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seductive_look (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_look (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seductive_eyes (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_eyes (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seductive_smile (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias seducing_smile (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)
create alias bedroon_eyes (0) -> bedroom_eyes (99992)

Reason: Standardization of tags that are related to seduction.

EDIT: The bulk update request #404 (forum #299843) has been approved by @Millcore.

Why is bedroom_x preferable to seductive_x? It seems less clear.

tittybitty said:
Why is bedroom_x preferable to seductive_x? It seems less clear.

bedroom_eyes is already very well established in comparison to the other ones. I would be in favor of aliasing it to seductive_look or seductive_expression, but people are probably more used to it now.

Fair enough, I'd exclude the *_smile aliases. They seem different enough from the gaze/eye based tags.

tittybitty said:
Fair enough, I'd exclude the *_smile aliases. They seem different enough from the gaze/eye based tags.

I thought about that as well, but after skimming through the posts, it seems that people just tag anything with bedroom_eyes + smile as it.

The bulk update request #404 (forum #299843) has been approved by @Millcore.