Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: mostly_nude -> clothed

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

I already suggested this implication a while back...it got rejected. Still no idea why...I'll give this my upvote, in the (probably vain) hope that history does not repeat itself.

jacob said:
I already suggested this implication a while back...it got rejected. Still no idea why...I'll give this my upvote, in the (probably vain) hope that history does not repeat itself.

We'll see. We had a talk about it on the discord today.

There are edge cases such as armor, which conditionally counts as clothing. This kind of change would force more of the armor posts to get clothing slapped onto them unnecessarily. There are other clothing-esque examples that may benefit from having this tag detached from clothed as well. Calling towel_only as nude has never sat well with me. The towel is performing the same job as clothing while not being an article of clothing by itself.

thevileone said:
There are edge cases such as armor, which conditionally counts as clothing. This kind of change would force more of the armor posts to get clothing slapped onto them unnecessarily. There are other clothing-esque examples that may benefit from having this tag detached from clothed as well. Calling towel_only as nude has never sat well with me. The towel is performing the same job as clothing while not being an article of clothing by itself.

If I understand your point correctly, you mean that this implications would be a stretch since mostly_nude is applicable to posts where a character is only wearing a towel (for example), which is not a piece of clothing. Makes sense
(Sorry, English is not my first language and I am sometimes clueless)

  • 1