The bulk update request #653 has been rejected.
create implication chest_fur (2381) -> fur (1610029)
create implication cum_on_fur (804) -> cum (662569)
create implication cum_on_fur (804) -> fur (1610029)
create implication short_fur (922) -> fur (1610029)
create implication black_and_white_fur (0) -> two_tone_fur (117953)
create implication dyed_fur (320) -> fur (1610029)
create implication cosmic_fur (280) -> fur (1610029)
create implication pale_fur (442) -> fur (1610029)
create implication gradient_fur (1129) -> fur (1610029)
create implication gradient_fur (1129) -> multicolored_fur (209725)
create implication patterned_fur (150) -> fur (1610029)
create alias multi_tone_fur (6) -> multicolored_fur (209725)
Reason: As far as I can tell, these are pretty self-explanatory, but I can provide more info if needed.
Will the fur tag likely be disambiguated or invalidated sometime? It seems like 1 in every 3 posts with fur doesn't actually have the tag. (an estimate and exaggeration please don't take that statistic seriously)
EDIT: The bulk update request #653 (forum #304142) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator