The bulk update request #809 is active.

create implication black_inner_ear_fluff (562) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication blue_inner_ear_fluff (818) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication brown_inner_ear_fluff (609) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication green_inner_ear_fluff (329) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication grey_inner_ear_fluff (1325) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication orange_inner_ear_fluff (512) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication pink_inner_ear_fluff (486) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication purple_inner_ear_fluff (337) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication red_inner_ear_fluff (780) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication tan_inner_ear_fluff (1834) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication white_inner_ear_fluff (9598) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)
create implication yellow_inner_ear_fluff (545) -> inner_ear_fluff (120042)

Reason: colored inner ear fluff is in fact inner ear fluff

EDIT: The bulk update request #809 (forum #307910) has been approved by @Millcore.

Should they perhaps imply [color]_fur as well? Or is fluff sufficiently different from fur?

watsit said:
Should they perhaps imply [color]_fur as well? Or is fluff sufficiently different from fur?

I've not seen any moth characters with ears, but "fluff" is sufficiently different from fur in what it can be applied to. Fur should probably only be used with hair-derived sources of softness... actually, brings up a good question about how many moths are tagged with _fur tags...