The bulk update request #931 is active.

create implication spiritfarer (68) -> thunder_lotus_games (68)
create implication gwen_(spiritfarer) (39) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication atul_(spiritfarer) (18) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication albert_(spiritfarer) (7) -> spiritfarer (68)

Reason: Spiritfarer is a video game made by Thunder Lotus Games, and those three characters are the only popular characters currently tagged.

EDIT: The bulk update request #931 (forum #310639) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3524 is active.

create implication alice_(spiritfarer) (1) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication astrid_(spiritfarer) (5) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication buck_(spiritfarer) (2) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication daffodil_(spiritfarer) (5) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication giovanni_(spiritfarer) (3) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication gustav_(spiritfarer) (1) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication mickey_(spiritfarer) (1) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication stanley_(spiritfarer) (2) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication stella_(spiritfarer) (9) -> spiritfarer (68)
create implication summer_(spiritfarer) (1) -> spiritfarer (68)

Reason: Additional characters from Spiritfare game now tagged at e621.
(There are other characters, but don't seem be at e621 yet)

EDIT: The bulk update request #3524 (forum #349457) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

furrin_gok said:
create implication spiritfarer (46) -> video_games (827584)

Shouldn't be there since they can be depicted without looking like a video game.

watsit said:
Shouldn't be there since they can be depicted without looking like a video game.

Hmm. Video_games wiki says
"used for any image or animation which shows a ... or a character, species, or item that relates to a video game copyright or franchise, as part of the scene."

I assume implication suggestion similar to existing implications such as silent_hill -> video_games

listerthesquirrel said:
Hmm. Video_games wiki says
"used for any image or animation which shows a ... or a character, species, or item that relates to a video game copyright or franchise, as part of the scene."

Which we're trying to kill. At the least, it's better to leave those implications as a separate request, so it can be handled separately and not block up the rest of the requests.

The bulk update request #931 (forum #310639) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3524 (forum #349457) has been approved by @gattonero2001.