hollyhock_manheim-mannheim-guerrero-robinson-zilberschlag-hsung-fonzerelli-mcquack_(bojack_horseman)

Yes, that's the current name of the tag.

1. Do we really, really need to use the full name of the character?
2. Why in god's name does it end with (bojack_horseman)?

According to topic #18732, hollyhock_(bojack_horseman) is the proposed short-form tag to be used in ease of tagging, but they had preferred the original full name to take precedent when being displayed.

thegreatwolfgang said:
but they had preferred the original full name to take precedent when being displayed.

But... why? Mario's full name is "Mario Mario", but I genuinely hope that doesn't become the tag name here.

strikerman said:
But... why? Mario's full name is "Mario Mario", but I genuinely hope that doesn't become the tag name here.

Probably a pseudo-joke tag, along the lines of that_one_bug_that_looks_like_a_croissant_that_you_can_freeze_and_use_as_a_platform or that_flower_what_appears_in_your_lawn_but_nobody_gives_a_single_fuck_of_her_(character).

watsit said:
Probably a pseudo-joke tag, along the lines of that_one_bug_that_looks_like_a_croissant_that_you_can_freeze_and_use_as_a_platform or that_flower_what_appears_in_your_lawn_but_nobody_gives_a_single_fuck_of_her_(character).

Hey the croissant tag at least still uses the Ripper tag. hollyhock_(bojack_horseman) and hollyhock should be unaliased from the big tag, aliased to one or the other, and then the other implicated to the big tag.

watsit said:
Probably a pseudo-joke tag, along the lines of that_one_bug_that_looks_like_a_croissant_that_you_can_freeze_and_use_as_a_platform or that_flower_what_appears_in_your_lawn_but_nobody_gives_a_single_fuck_of_her_(character).

Those two are fairly niche. I'm not sure how to feel about a notable character from a popular show getting a joke tag as her one and only tag.

The bulk update request #1006 is active.

remove alias hollyhock (0) -> hollyhock_manheim-mannheim-guerrero-robinson-zilberschlag-hsung-fonzerelli-mcquack_(bojack_horseman) (0)
remove alias hollyhock_(bojack_horseman) (219) -> hollyhock_manheim-mannheim-guerrero-robinson-zilberschlag-hsung-fonzerelli-mcquack_(bojack_horseman) (0)
remove alias hollyhock_manheim-mannheim-guerrero-robinson-zilberschlag-hsung-fonzerelli-mcquack (0) -> hollyhock_manheim-mannheim-guerrero-robinson-zilberschlag-hsung-fonzerelli-mcquack_(bojack_horseman) (0)

Reason: Having a ridiculously long name as the main tag, especially with that identifier stapled on, for a character from a popular show who has a decent number of posts, is... questionable. hollyhock_(bojack_horseman) seems perfectly fine as the default.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1006 (forum #311788) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

it's actually messing with the site's format it's that big

I should think that hollyhock_mcquack would be sufficient as that would likely be the most current surname she uses on her tax return, even if that sounds a heck of a lot like a refugee from Ducktales. There's being thorough, but that has to bow before practicality sometimes.

strikerman said:
it's actually messing with the site's format it's that big

Almost looks normal, took me a while to notice that Show | Reject | Edit had Edit on another line; I thought you were talking about the word-wrap which is perfectly normal.

I like the joke tag, that's why I thumbs down

closetpossum said:
I like the joke tag, that's why I thumbs down

Why should this character have a joke tag?

strikerman said:
Why should this character have a joke tag?

It's their official name, that happens to also be a joke. A better question is, why shouldn't it be a joke tag? It's not like it's hard to use given the aliases, or to understand who it's referencing (Hollyhock is the first word in the tag that's also their first name, and it has _(bojack_horseman) at the end in case it's still ambiguous).

strikerman said:
Why should this character have a joke tag?

technically, it's not a joke tag, it's her name.

It is literally causing visual bugs in the site's interface. It simply does not need to be that long, tags are meant to be easy to search and nothing more. Why are people hanging on to this thing so wholeheartedly? If you want something funny to look at, go look up the humor tag.

gattonero2001 said:
It is literally causing visual bugs in the site's interface. It simply does not need to be that long, tags are meant to be easy to search and nothing more. Why are people hanging on to this thing so wholeheartedly? If you want something funny to look at, go look up the humor tag.

you can type hollyhock in search and the tag shows up.
So what you said is kinda invalid. At least the case where you said searches are
meant to be easy...which it is...you just type hollyhock...then boom it's there, her full name

As for wanting something funny, just go to humor? You missed the point.

closetpossum said:
technically, it's not a joke tag, it's her name.

If I make a character whose name is the entire name of the chemical titin should e6 really support my ~200,000 character long tag?

korbok said:
If I make a character whose name is the entire name of the chemical titin should e6 really support my ~200,000 character long tag?

I think you're just being unreasonable to prove your point really.

gattonero2001 said:
It is literally causing visual bugs in the site's interface. It simply does not need to be that long, tags are meant to be easy to search and nothing more. Why are people hanging on to this thing so wholeheartedly? If you want something funny to look at, go look up the humor tag.

Seconding this, tags are supposed to be (mostly) functional, not funny.

watsit said:
and it has _(bojack_horseman) at the end in case it's still ambiguous).

you're better than this

The bulk update request #1006 (forum #311788) has been approved by @gattonero2001.