The bulk update request #1009 has been rejected.

create implication imminent_anal_vore (162) -> imminent_vore (6838)
create implication imminent_cock_vore (52) -> imminent_vore (6838)
create implication imminent_oral_vore (860) -> imminent_vore (6838)
create implication imminent_tail_vore (7) -> imminent_vore (6838)
create implication imminent_unbirth (114) -> imminent_vore (6838)

Reason: These are all forms of vore and should imply imminent_vore.

imminent_oral_vore, imminent_nipple_vore, imminent_breast_vore, imminent_tail_vore and more I'm surely forgetting should also imply imminent_vore but I left them just in case tags that don't exist cause issues, assuming this means the tag doesn't exist.

Let me know if anything is wrong here or if the other tags are fine to add.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1009 (forum #311852) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The specific imminent_(type)_vore tags shouldn't exist independently anyways, imminent_vore + (type)_vore would cover the same content without the extra tags.
Changed my mind

freeneko said:
The specific imminent_(type)_vore tags shouldn't exist independently anyways, imminent_vore + (type)_vore would cover the same content without the extra tags.

shouldn't be tagged with [orifice]_vore. [orifice]_vore means vore through the given orifice is occurring, and imminent_[type]_vore means vore through the given orifice is about to occur. It can't be both at the same time, just like imminent_anal isn't also tagged as anal.

watsit said:
imminent_[type]_vore shouldn't be tagged with [orifice]_vore. [orifice]_vore means vore through the given orifice is occurring, and imminent_[type]_vore means vore through the given orifice is about to occur. It can't be both at the same time, just like imminent_anal isn't also tagged as anal.

I think that argument works better for imminent_vore and vore being tagged at the same time, but for [orifice]_vore... then how would someone search for a character about to be inserted into an anus, vagina or penis specifically? I understand what you're saying, but are there any other solutions you'd suggest?

freeneko said:
then how would someone search for a character about to be inserted into an anus, vagina or penis specifically?

imminent_anal_vore, imminent_unbirth, imminent_cock_vore, etc. The tags this BUR is implicating to imminent_vore. The problem with using imminent_vore+anal_vore, for example, is that anal_vore implicates anal and vore, which would cause an imminent_vore pic to be tagged with anal and vore too when that's not yet happening.

The bulk update request #1009 (forum #311852) has been rejected by @slyroon.