The tag alias #54765 nutjob -> balljob has been rejected.

Reason: nutjob is currently unlike any other balls-related tag, using informal language for it that makes actually finding the tag to begin with difficult. All the other balls tags use "balls," this should be no different.
Also, nutjob is far more commonly used as a colloquialism for a crazy person. I understand if someone thought the name was clever, but it just hampers tag discovery.
This would bring the tag in line with other balls-related tags.

EDIT: The tag alias nutjob -> balljob (forum #318558) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Shouldn't it be invalidated or disambiguated then? Since nutjob can also mean a crazy/insane person, as opposed to balljob.
Also the reverse alias (balljob -> nutjob) was rejected before, see topic #25495.

thegreatwolfgang said:
Shouldn't it be invalidated or disambiguated then? Since nutjob can also mean a crazy/insane person, as opposed to balljob.
Also the reverse alias (balljob -> nutjob) was rejected before, see topic #25495.

Not to mention the animated movie The Nut Job and its sequel.

Something like this, then?

I feel pretty confident about the mass update - I don't think anyone has ever actually used "nutjob" in its other sense on this site, but I agree the existing tag is both confusingly named and inconsistent.

The BUR can't be made until this alias is rejected, though.

It feels pretty common to see people confused that there's no balljob tag on posts about it

The tag alias nutjob -> balljob (forum #318558) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #1554 is active.

create alias nutjob (0) -> nutjob_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias ball_fuck (0) -> balljob (793)

Reason: Is this happening?

EDIT: Apparently not, topic #29286 needs to be rejected (and replicated) too.

DOUBLE EDIT: Added ball_fuck alias, which seems to have been widely approved other than the "nutjob" issue in the previous thread.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1554 (forum #320216) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

wat8548 said:
Apparently not, topic #29286 needs to be rejected (and replicated) too.

You just have to ask an admin in the Discord server whenever something like this happens. It's good to go now

Do we really need a disambiguation page for this one? Why not just alias it directly? Is anybody actually going to try to tag “nutjob” on a post with a crazy person and not think it might possibly refer to a sex act instead?

scaliespe said:
Is anybody actually going to try to tag “nutjob” on a post with a crazy person and not think it might possibly refer to a sex act instead?

Yes.
They most definitely will.

bitwolfy said:
Yes.
They most definitely will.

To take a cue from the Batman franchise, these Jokers get tagged nutjob that way, right?

bumping this as it has had some activity from myself and others. is BUR #1554 still on the table?
Other small tags to be aware of:

• autonutjob
• double_nutjob -> double_balljob?
• collaborative_nutjob -> double_balljob since the only two posts are with 2 actors?
• ball_job -> balljob

The bulk update request #1554 (forum #320216) has been approved by @gattonero2001.