Implicating breast_grab -> breasts.

Reason: In order to perform a breast_grab, one must need a pair of breasts to grab :p

*Phoenix's voice*

HOLD IT!

I've seen only one case where you don't:
post #268613

What if the victim is actually flat_chested?

Xch3l said:
*Phoenix's voice*

HOLD IT!

I've seen only one case where you don't:
post #268613

Invisa-boob? Wait...wouldn't that technically still be considered a breast grab?

GreyMaria said:
What if the victim is actually flat_chested?

The victim wouldn't technically have breasts if the victim is flat-chested

TheHuskyK9 said:
The victim wouldn't technically have breasts if the victim is flat-chested

But you can still grope their chest area, which is still invading one's personal space in the same manner, which still constitutes a breast_grab.

GreyMaria said:
But you can still grope their chest area, which is still invading one's personal space in the same manner, which still constitutes a breast_grab.

chest_grab?

TheHuskyK9 said:
The victim wouldn't technically have breasts if the victim is flat-chested

I still find the e621 definition of breasts hard to get used to, since it doesn't correlate with actual biology. Both male and female humans have breasts, though the female ones are more developed...and usually larger.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Invisa-boob? Wait...wouldn't that technically still be considered a breast grab?

It is, but without breasts… visible… at least… yeah…

Genjar said:
I still find the e621 definition of breasts hard to get used to, since it doesn't correlate with actual biology. Both male and female humans have breasts, though the female ones are more developed...and usually larger.

Well, for males, they usually get the pecs tag instead of breasts